Bodily Explorations in Space: Social Experience of a Multimodal Art Installation

Jacucci, Giulio; Spagnolli, Anna; Chalambalakis, Alessandro; Morrison, Ann; Liikkanen, Lassi A.; Roveda, Stefano; Bertoncini, Massimo

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-03658-3_11

Cited by 50 publications

(30 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Several approaches have been presented for evaluating such criteria both qualitatively and qualitatively. Jaccucci et al [15] mention several quantitative methods and end up using Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) [16] together with interviews and video recordings to evaluate visitor experiences of two interactive art installations. Similarly, Kortbek & Grønbaek [17] use a mixed methods approach including their own multiple-choice questionnaire and interviews to evaluate interactive installations in an art museum.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluating Intimacy and Ludic Engagement with a Musical Interactive Art Installation that Explores Remote Abstract Communication

Gelineck

2015

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. The main contribution of the paper is a usability evaluation of an interactive art installation where several different factors for ludic and intimate engagement in this specific context of remote face-to-face non-verbal communication are compared. Experiments are carried out with the following different overall goals: (1) to understand the importance of direct eye contact, (2) to understand the influence of using different musical outputs and (3) to understand whether providing participants with more detailed control supports exploration. Results indicate that direct eye contact enhances the intimate connection, that opera sounds are more effective than synthetic sounds in terms of intimacy, control, musical expressivity and exploration, and that participants engaged in more exploration with limited control.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluating Intimacy and Ludic Engagement with a Musical Interactive Art Installation that Explores Remote Abstract Communication

Gelineck

2015

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…During this final selection round, consensus (i.e., a total score of 6, or 2 from each researcher) was needed for the articles to be included in data extraction. Ultimately, 13 articles were included (Bialoskorski et al, 2010;Costello et al, 2005;Deray and Simoff, 2012;Gurion and Jacoby, 2013;Her and Hamlyn, 2010;Hespanhol and Tomitsch, 2014;Hohl, 2009;Jacucci et al, 2009;Morgan and Gunes, 2013;Morrison et al, 2011bMorrison et al, , 2008Morrison et al, , 2011aMuller, 2008).…”

Section: Selection Processmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…They identified frameworks that discuss artwork characteristics, user interactions with them, or both. Similarly, Jacucci et al (2009) listed frameworks for studying aesthetic experiences with interactive art. However, none of these studies or the frameworks identified in them report actual participant responses.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Participant responses to physical, open-ended interactive digital artworks: a systematic review

Luyten¹,

Braun

Hooren³

et al. 2017

IJART

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:The main aim of this systematic review was to describe responses of participants to physical, open-ended interactive digital artworks. Although human-to-artwork and human-to-human responses were found in the 22 identified artworks, more human-to-artwork responses were reported. Both types of responses were further categorised into physical, verbal, and cognitive/emotional responses. The artworks varied from small table-top installations to large, dark open spaces, and had a range of interactive components and features from a heart rate interface to complete body movements. Results imply there is no straightforward relationship between the features of the artwork and the kind of response. However, two factors seemed to influence the participants' responses: the content (concrete or abstract) of the artwork, and the presence of others. Creating interactive artworks that challenge new audiences and/or evoke specific responses requires more knowledge about the dynamics of the interaction between people and interactive artworks. Participant responses to physical, open-ended interactive digital artworks 95

show abstract

“…In Coutrix et al [3], visitors' interactions with a virtual puppet on a public screen were analysed, detailing performative resources and recurring dramatic structure of sessions. Similarly, phases of collaborative explorations of a multimodal art installation were analysed in Jacucci et al [10]. These types of analysis are also applicable to non-artistic contexts such as interaction on a public display or collocated interaction with augmented reality [11,15].…”

Section: Performative Interaction In Hcimentioning

confidence: 99%

Understanding performative interactions in public settings

Williamson

Hansen

Light

et al. 2014

Pers Ubiquit Comput

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Interactive digital technologies pervade our shared spaces in personal, mobile, infrastructural and other embedded forms. These changes challenge the ways we understand and investigate the relationships between people, computing and settings. Responding to this situation-where ubiquitous computing is not only personal but also public, and where digital interactions may happen anywhere-this special issue explores how HCI research can use the strengths of an intersection of theory, practice and innovation in order to best address this conjunction of interactive technologies, public spaces and people interacting with or within both.With this shift to interaction happening in public spaces, people can no longer be seen as just 'users' but have to be understood as acting assemblages of bodies and technologies in the space they inhabit. This shift highlights the need to understand users in every setting-including those at desks and at work-as socially and culturally situated humans with agency. While this is not a new research development, this special issue speculates on and discusses how the shift to 'everywhere interactions' makes it important for research in human-computer interaction to reach beyond existing conventions. With this work comes a need to understand the interacting human as a situated body that is at any moment also a possible spectacle: as a body, a human and a user who engages with technology in response to the situation while also being a 'performance' for others to witness. Understanding people as actors in their context allows us to regard every user as a 'performing body' and a 'performing subject', and it enables us to analyse the performative aspects of interaction in many other situations than those where we design for actually staged performances in a defined performance space or stage. In this sense, 'performative interaction' is both concerned with technologies for on-stage performers using technologies as part of artistic expression, and an analytical frame for understanding every situation in which people engage with technologies (in public space). The question becomes: where and in which situations is this analytical frame relevant and useful?Recognising a growing interest in the HCI community to work with ubiquitous computing as a personal but also public technology, the editors set out to explore a number of topics within performative interaction that would develop and possibly consolidate contemporary work into a nuanced perspective on human-computer interaction in public space. Partly based on previous work with these questions, we selected contributions that expand our understanding of performative interfaces in a variety of settings as well as demonstrate ways of participating in performative interaction, of developing techniques for hiding and showcasing different elements of performance and of evaluating the experience of performing in public.

show abstract

Bodily Explorations in Space: Social Experience of a Multimodal Art Installation

Cited by 50 publications

References 17 publications

Evaluating Intimacy and Ludic Engagement with a Musical Interactive Art Installation that Explores Remote Abstract Communication

Evaluating Intimacy and Ludic Engagement with a Musical Interactive Art Installation that Explores Remote Abstract Communication

Participant responses to physical, open-ended interactive digital artworks: a systematic review

Understanding performative interactions in public settings

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About