Body Dialectics in the Age of Goethe 2003
DOI: 10.1163/9789004334359_020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bodily Grace and Consciousness: from the Enlightenment to Romanticism

Abstract: The mechanistic view of the soul as an extension of the body, propounded by de l a Mettrie in 1747, finds later variations in Schiller's theory of grace in Anmut und Würde (1793), in Kleist's Über das Marionettentheater (1810) and in Hoffmann's Der Sandmann (1815). Schiller binds body and soul in his definition of physical grace; Kleist first removes and then reinstates consciousness as a requisite for grace. Finally, Hoffmann tells of a failed alliance between consciousness and the mechanical.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In his 1793 essay Anmut und Würde [Grace and Dignity] Schiller aimed to de-mechanize the soul while at the same time retaining its synthetic connection with the body: grace is physical beauty in motion, animated by the soul. 65 There are echoes of this antimechanistic impetus in Clausewitz's letter to Fichte, where he repeatedly pitched the moral forces of the individual against the mechanical, over-rationalized machine-like tendencies of eighteenth century military organization. 66 However, since Schiller's aesthetic theory is inherently a theory of morality, the significance of the soul for Schiller went further.…”
Section: Clausewitz Was Not Convinced By Schiller's Aesthetic Utopia mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In his 1793 essay Anmut und Würde [Grace and Dignity] Schiller aimed to de-mechanize the soul while at the same time retaining its synthetic connection with the body: grace is physical beauty in motion, animated by the soul. 65 There are echoes of this antimechanistic impetus in Clausewitz's letter to Fichte, where he repeatedly pitched the moral forces of the individual against the mechanical, over-rationalized machine-like tendencies of eighteenth century military organization. 66 However, since Schiller's aesthetic theory is inherently a theory of morality, the significance of the soul for Schiller went further.…”
Section: Clausewitz Was Not Convinced By Schiller's Aesthetic Utopia mentioning
confidence: 99%