1987
DOI: 10.1051/rnd:19870609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Body composition, metabolic rate and utilization of milk nutrients in suckling piglets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

15
65
6
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
15
65
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It continues to increase and reaches 11% by 3 weeks. During the 3-week suckling period, 54% of milk fat intake is retained in the body (Noblet and Etienne, 1987) with fat accretion occurring at a mean rate of 30 to 35 g/day, depending mainly on the amount of ingested milk (Marion and Le and on the milk fat content (Jones et al, 1999).…”
Section: Adipose Tissue Development and Low Birth Weight Pigletsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It continues to increase and reaches 11% by 3 weeks. During the 3-week suckling period, 54% of milk fat intake is retained in the body (Noblet and Etienne, 1987) with fat accretion occurring at a mean rate of 30 to 35 g/day, depending mainly on the amount of ingested milk (Marion and Le and on the milk fat content (Jones et al, 1999).…”
Section: Adipose Tissue Development and Low Birth Weight Pigletsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, selection for large litters has had the unintended consequence of reducing the average birth weight of piglets (Foxcroft et al, 2009) that has decreased their capacity to ingest colostrum (Amdi et al, 2013). Another problem with low birth weight piglets is that they have a greater energy requirement per kg of birth weight (Noblet and Etienne, 1987) because of their high surface-tovolume ratio. Selection for large litters has further challenged survival of these piglets because sows do not have an inherent mechanism to favor a high glycogen deposition in small born piglets Amdi et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The activity level of sucking piglets was higher compared to that of artificially reared piglets, because sucking piglets spent time and energy fighting for their gland position and stimulating the sow's udder. Another reason for the higher CO 2 production observed in sucking piglets is the higher intake of milk energy, which is known to increase O 2 consumption (Noblet and Etienne 1987) and, therefore, also increases CO 2 production. Noblet and Etienne (1987) measured the gas exchange of sucking piglets between sucking bouts ('resp-suckle-resp' approach) and reported a daily CO 2 production of 63.4 l per piglet, which is similar to that found in the present study for artificially reared piglets, but not for the sucking piglets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another reason for the higher CO 2 production observed in sucking piglets is the higher intake of milk energy, which is known to increase O 2 consumption (Noblet and Etienne 1987) and, therefore, also increases CO 2 production. Noblet and Etienne (1987) measured the gas exchange of sucking piglets between sucking bouts ('resp-suckle-resp' approach) and reported a daily CO 2 production of 63.4 l per piglet, which is similar to that found in the present study for artificially reared piglets, but not for the sucking piglets. Initially, we planned to adopt their 'resp-suckle-resp' approach but realised that piglets slept most of the time between the sucking bouts, which, therefore causes an underestimation of the litter HE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation