Body Corporate Palm Lane v Masinge 2013 JDR 2332 (GNP)

Boraine, Andre; Roestoff, Melanie

doi:10.17159/2225-7160/2015/v48n1a13

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…But, the study failed to consider relative advantage and self efficacy. Masinge (2010) added risk and trust constructs to the TAM model which is appreciable but could not highlight the constructs namely, relative advantage and self efficacy. Luarn and Lin (2004), Crabbe et al (2009), Barati and Mohammadi (2009), Lee (2008), Wessels and Drennan (2010), Püschel et al (2010), Zhou et al (2010), Akturan and Tezcan (2012) failed to consider trust construct.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…According to Siau and Shen (2003), trust is classified into two categories: trust of technology and trust of mobile banking service providers. This was later on held up by Lee et al (2007) in a study that concentrated on three trust components: trust in bank, trust in mobile network provider and trust in wireless infrastructure (Masinge, 2010). Trust in the mobile service providers and banks helps to promote the service rapidly across the country.…”

Section: Trustmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

An Empirical Investigation of Mobile Banking Adoption in Developing Countries

Pavithran¹,

Varaprasad

Sridharan

et al. 2014

International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mobile phone has become an integral part of our lives. The penetration rate of mobile phones in the developing countries has increased abruptly and this is a good sign for the banking sector. Mobile banking is the most recently launched innovative feat in the banking sector. The unique ability of mobile banking to perform banking transactions irrespective of place and time has given a competitive edge over traditional banking. Even though, all circumstances are in favour of mobile banking, it has failed to take off in most of the developing countries. Hence, the main objective of the study is to find out the constructs which affect the adoption of mobile banking in India. A model has been proposed with the factors namely perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, self-efficacy, perceived risk, perceived enjoyment, relative advantage, compatibility, trust, social influence and personal innovativeness. The proposed model has been tested using various statistical analyses and the findings of this study reveal that relative advantage has the strongest relationship with the intention to use mobile banking.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Trustmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Empirical Investigation of Mobile Banking Adoption in Developing Countries

Pavithran¹,

Varaprasad

Sridharan

et al. 2014

International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Rochelle argues that "society should not reward the cautious man who buries his talent and takes no chances; it most emphatically should do everything in its power to assist the man who creates jobs, the man who strives to turn his one talent into ten -even if he fails in the attempt." 169 As a policy, society should encourage individuals to use their skills and be creative in their activities, even if they may fail.…”

Section: Debt Relief Provisions In the United Kingdommentioning

confidence: 99%

The Requirement of Advantage to Creditors in South African Insolvency Law – a Critical Appraisal

Kanamugire

2013

MJSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

South African Insolvency law provides for voluntary surrender and compulsory sequestration. The Insolvency Act requires the insolvent debtor to satisfy the court that sequestration will be to the advantage of his or her creditors. Many insolvent debtors face a challenge to prove advantage of creditors as they do not have sufficient assets in their estates. For a creditor to succeed in sequestrating the insolvent estate, he or she must obtain both provisional and final sequestration orders. In granting a provisional sequestration order, the court must be of the opinion that prima facie there is reason to believe that it will be to the advantage of creditors of the debtor if his or her estate is sequestrated. Concerning a final sequestration order, the sequestrating creditor must satisfy the court that there is reason to believe that it will be to the advantage of the creditors of the debtor if his or her estate is sequestrated. The court has a duty to carefully scrutinise friendly sequestrations in order to protect the interest of creditors. At least the court must be satisfied that there are assets for the creditors to obtain a not negligible dividend. Even if there are no assets, the court can still grant the sequestration order, as the investigation and interrogation provided under Insolvency Act may reveal some assets. Poor debtors do not obtain sequestration orders as they cannot prove advantage to creditors if their estates are sequestrated. Society should assist individuals who use their talents and create jobs, even if they fail in the process. It is recommended that advantage to creditors should not be a requirement for sequestration.

show abstract

Body Corporate Palm Lane v Masinge 2013 JDR 2332 (GNP)

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

An Empirical Investigation of Mobile Banking Adoption in Developing Countries

An Empirical Investigation of Mobile Banking Adoption in Developing Countries

The Requirement of Advantage to Creditors in South African Insolvency Law – a Critical Appraisal

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About