2014
DOI: 10.1002/oby.20709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Body fat, especially visceral fat, is associated with electrocardiographic measures of sympathetic activation

Abstract: Objective: Obesity is associated with sympathetic activation, but the role of different fat depots is unclear. The association between body fat, specifically visceral fat, and electrocardiographic measures of sympathetic activation in a population with structurally normal hearts was investigated. Methods: In this cross-sectional baseline analysis of the Netherlands Epidemiology of Obesity study, body fat percentage was assessed with BIA and abdominal subcutaneous (SAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) with ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
21
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Possibilities are increased sympathetic system activity, elevation of the diaphragm and increased cardiac output leading to left ventricular hypertrophy [36, 37]. Body fat was associated with measures of sympathetic activation in subjects with structurally normal hearts in the NEO study [38]. The leftward (superior) shifts of the T-, P- and QRS axis were associated with obesity in other studies [3941].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possibilities are increased sympathetic system activity, elevation of the diaphragm and increased cardiac output leading to left ventricular hypertrophy [36, 37]. Body fat was associated with measures of sympathetic activation in subjects with structurally normal hearts in the NEO study [38]. The leftward (superior) shifts of the T-, P- and QRS axis were associated with obesity in other studies [3941].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, repolarisation markers have been studied in athletes and in non‐morbidly obese populations …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A potential explanation may be the differences in methods used, as our study utilized SphygmoCor MM3 system while the Farah et al, used a heart rate monitor (POLAR, RS 800CX), which may have differences in sensitivity. Another potential explanation for this discrepancy is our adjustment for pubertal maturation and adiposity, both of which have been shown to affect these relationships(23, 24). Additionally, our sample had a larger proportion of youth classified as pre-hypertensive / hypertensive (25% versus 9.7%), which could help explain these differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%