2021
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.742525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Body Image During Pregnancy in the Era of Coronavirus Disease 2019: The Role of Heterogeneous Patterns of Perceived Social Support

Abstract: Objective: The aim of this study was to explore the profiles of pregnant women on perceived social support with regard to sociodemographic variables, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related distress issues, and body image. We compared the aforementioned relationships within the study variables between pregnant women and a control group of non-pregnant women.Method: The study sample comprised 345 women, 157 pregnant women, and 188 women in the control group. Participants filled out paper-and-pencil or onlin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, recent extensive epidemiological studies have shown that these catastrophic projections were highly exaggerated, and many people even reported some positive changes due to the new lifestyle imposed by the pandemic [ 49 ]. This corresponds particularly with research on the quality of life among pregnant women during the Covid-19 pandemic, whose emotional well-being was even better than before the pandemic due to the greater emotional support received at this critical time, as well as the more subjective sense of the closeness of family life [ 50 , 51 ]. Although this topic requires further study, this may explain why the Covid-19 pandemic did not have any association with body image anxiety or depression in the control group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…However, recent extensive epidemiological studies have shown that these catastrophic projections were highly exaggerated, and many people even reported some positive changes due to the new lifestyle imposed by the pandemic [ 49 ]. This corresponds particularly with research on the quality of life among pregnant women during the Covid-19 pandemic, whose emotional well-being was even better than before the pandemic due to the greater emotional support received at this critical time, as well as the more subjective sense of the closeness of family life [ 50 , 51 ]. Although this topic requires further study, this may explain why the Covid-19 pandemic did not have any association with body image anxiety or depression in the control group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The results were non-significant ( p = 0.17), suggesting that the use of independent samples (overall effect size = 0.22) or repeated measures samples (ES = -0.16) did not affect outcomes, however, due to there being only four with repeated measures samples these results should be interpreted with caution. Gestation was also reported in all but two papers [ 14 , 58 ]. When gestation was reported, this was done in many different ways (e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…However, only three studies analysed the effect of gravidity [ 31 , 55 , 64 ]; two of these studies found that women in their first pregnancy (primigravidae) have lower body dissatisfaction than multigravidae (M = 5.76 / 6.01 [ 31 ] and M = 139.2 / 143.8 [ 55 ] for primigravidae and multigravidae, respectively), whereas the third study [ 64 ] found primigravidae had slightly higher body dissatisfaction (M = 9.61) than multigravidae (M = 7.01). Due to the other fourteen studies not reporting separate means for gravidity (N=8; [ 12 , 14 , 56 58 , 62 , 65 67 ]), not reporting gravidity (N=3; [ 36 , 59 , 63 ]), or only testing primigravidae (N=3; [ 60 , 61 , 70 ]) no statistical analysis was possible within this meta analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations