“…Former studies have shown, that even though sexes exhibit independent variations in body mass across seasons [Fietz, 1998;Petter-Rousseaux, 1980;Schmid, 1997;Schmid & Kappeler, 1998], M. murinus lacks sexual size dimorphism concerning various body measurements such as length and width of head and ear, length of body, tail, hindfoot, and canine length [Fietz, 1998;Kappeler, 1997a;Schmid & Kappeler, 1998]. If M. murinus mates polygynously, it would be expected that it exhibits strong sexual size dimorphism, exclusive male territories, and small relative testes size [Cheverud et al, 1985;Clutton-Brock et.…”