1979
DOI: 10.2466/pms.1979.49.3.723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Body Perception in Athletes and Non-Athletes

Abstract: 20 male athletes and 20 control subjects were required to make estimates of the length of their body dimensions and of external comparison objects. Athletes were more accurate in judging body dimensions than comparison objects while the reverse pattern was demonstrated by non-athletes. The results are discussed on the basis of the possible influence of sports activities on body perception.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has already been suggested that athletes may be more accurate than non‐athletes in perceiving body dimensions (Rossi & Zoccolotti, 1979). Our subjects who exercised regularly (but were not training) did not have improved perception, in comparison to the lean, non‐exercisers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has already been suggested that athletes may be more accurate than non‐athletes in perceiving body dimensions (Rossi & Zoccolotti, 1979). Our subjects who exercised regularly (but were not training) did not have improved perception, in comparison to the lean, non‐exercisers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these cases appear to be particularly linked to sports or physical activity situations. We can also argue that there is a circular relationship between sports and body image: by engaging in sports, people enact a specific body image and transform it as well as their way of practicing their sport (e.g., Rossi and Zoccolotti, 1979 ). Schilder observed that human beings are confined and disturbed by body image ( Schilder et al, 1968 ).…”
Section: Enactive Body Image: Awareness and Appearancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fisher analisou outros estudos, que traziam investigações acerca de diferentes variáveis influenciando na percepção normal do tamanho do corpo, verificando: (a) a influência que o movimento ativo de uma parte específica do corpo pode exercer sobre o julgamento do tamanho da mesma (Fuher & Cowan, 1967;Hester, 1970;Rossi & Zoccolotti, 1979); (b) a diferença no julgamento do tamanho de uma parte do corpo quando o indíviduo está em movimento ou parado (Hart, 1971;Stiles & Smith, 1977); (c) a relação: quanto menos o indivíduo se percebe diferenciado de um determinado objeto, mais este objeto se revela "próximo" do seu "eu", isto é, possuindo um significado particular e subjetivo para aquele indivíduo (Schlater, Baker, & Wapner, 1970); e (d) que a técnica sensori-tonic (Wapner, 1960) pôde demonstrar que variáveis como o contexto espacial (ambientes abertos ou fechados), a articulação das bordas (ser tocado ou não ser tocado) e a função (segurar ou não segurar um objeto ou ferramenta) também influenciam a estimação do tamanho de partes do corpo (Fisher, 1970). Fisher (1986) verificou que os dados demonstravam que quanto maior complexidade e similaridade com o corpo humano, menos o objeto é percebido de forma bem precisa.…”
Section: Prl Ribeiro Mcf Tavaresunclassified