Body Projects and the Regulation of Normative Masculinity

Abstract

Articles available via LSE Research Articles AbstractDrawing on interviews with 140 young British males, this paper explores the ways in which men talk about their own bodies and bodily practices, and those of other men. The specific focus of interest is a variety of body modification practices, including working out (at a gym) tattooing, piercing and cosmetic surgery. We want to argue, however, that the significance of this analysis extends beyond the topic of body modification to a broader set of issues concerned with the nature of men's embodied identities. In discussing the appearance of their bodies, the men we interviewed talked less about muscle and skin than about their own selves located within particular social, cultural and moral universes. The surfaces of their bodies were, as Mike Featherstone (1991) has argued, charged primarily with 'identity functions', allowing men to establish a place for themselves in contemporary society.Using a social psychological approach which can be characterised as a discursive analysis (Henwood, Gill & McLean, 1999;Lupton, 1998), this paper makes connections between men's private feelings and bodily practices, and broader social and cultural trends and relations. It shows that in talking about seemingly trivial questions such as whether to have one's nose pierced or whether to join a gym, men are actively engaged in constructing and policing appropriate masculine behaviours and identities; above all, in regulating normative masculinity. We identify five key discourses or 'interpretive repertoires' (Wetherell & Potter, 1992) which together construct the meanings for these men of attempts to modify the appearance of the body. The five discourses or repertoires were focused on the themes of individualism and 'being different'; libertarianism and the autonomous body; unselfconsciousness and the rejection of vanity; a notion of the 'well-balanced' and unobsessional self; and self-respect and the morally accountable body. Our analysis lends support to the claim that the body has become a new (identity) project in high/late/postmodernity (e.g. Shilling, 1993;Featherstone, 1991), but shows how fraught with difficulties this project is for young men who must simultaneously work on and discipline their bodies while disavowing any (inappropriate) interest in their own appearance. The analysis highlights the pervasive individualism of young men's discourses, and the absence of alternative ways of making sense of embodied experiences.2

Internalization as a mediator of the relationship between conformity to masculine norms and body image attitudes and behaviors among young men in Sweden, US, UK, and Australia

“…UK depictions of masculinity may be less clearly related to the internalization of body ideals (Jankowski, Fawkner, Slater, & Tiggemann, 2014). It has previously been reported that, among British males, the embodiment of masculinity was associated with resistance to conformity and the rejection of vanity or conscious and discernible efforts to improve physical appearance (Gill, Henwood, & McLean, 2005). Moreover, Gough (2006) noted upon review of UK newspaper articles on men and food and diet that focusing on one's diet was often construed as un-masculine and often "trivialized and mocked" in the media (p. 335).…”

Gender differences in response to Facebook status updates from same and opposite gender friends

“…Banter is defined as 'the playful exchange of teasing remarks' (Oxford Dictionaries, 2010) and is often associated with male conversations because it is consistent with the cultural discourses surrounding masculinity (Kiesling, 2007). There has been considerable research on banter in face to face interactions and researchers argue that it can play a supportive and positive role in male interactions (Adams et al, 2010;Gill, Henwood, & McLean, 2005, Hein & O'Donohoe, 2014. Plester and Sayers (2007) describe how using banter is a social glue which keeps groups together.…”

“Not Hiding, Not Shouting, Just Me”: Gay Men Negotiate Their Visual Identities

“…Our interest is not with gay men's actual clothing practices, but rather with how gay men explain their clothing practices and visual identities in ways that 'makes sense' -can be heard as coherent and justifiable -in relation to the various pressures they face as gay men. As such, this research is informed by research on the social construction of visual identities (Clarke & Spence, 2013;Frith & Gleeson, 2004) and on the discursive negotiation of identity more broadly (Clarkson, 2006;Dickerson, 2000;Gill, Henwood & McLean, 2005). This tradition of research views identity work as a fundamentally social (rather than psychological) practice and seeks to examine the broader socio-cultural discourses that underpin individual accounts of identity.…”