2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2015.03.116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Body-relatedness in severe somatoform disorder: Evaluation of the Dresden Body Image Questionnaire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Internal consistency of the subscales (Dutch version) in a non-clinical sample was good, varying from Cronbach's α = 0.74 for the subscale physical contact to α = 0.91 for the subscale sexual fulfilment Scheffers, van Duijn, Bosscher, Wiersma, & van Busschbach, 2017). People with somatoform disorder scored substantially lower on all subscales than a non-clinical sample (Scheffers, Kalisvaart et al, 2017).…”
Section: Questionnairementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Internal consistency of the subscales (Dutch version) in a non-clinical sample was good, varying from Cronbach's α = 0.74 for the subscale physical contact to α = 0.91 for the subscale sexual fulfilment Scheffers, van Duijn, Bosscher, Wiersma, & van Busschbach, 2017). People with somatoform disorder scored substantially lower on all subscales than a non-clinical sample (Scheffers, Kalisvaart et al, 2017).…”
Section: Questionnairementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Dresdner Body Image Questionnaire DBIQ [23, 24]; five aspects of body image are captured by 35 items: vitality, self-acceptance, self-aggrandisement, physical closeness, and sexual fulfilment. The subscales cover ranges of 1–5 with higher values representing a more pronounced characteristic of the dimension under question.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%