2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07779.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Body size and coexistence in gamasid mites parasitic on small mammals: null model analyses at three hierarchical scales

Abstract: We studied body size ratio in gamasid mites (Acari: Mesostigmata) parasitic on Palearctic small mammals at 3 hierarchical scales, namely infracommunities (an assemblage of mites harboured by an individual host), component communities (an assemblage of mites harboured by a host population), and compound communities (an assemblage of mites harboured by a host community). We used null models and asked a) whether body size distributions in these communities demonstrate non‐random patterns; b) whether these pattern… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is especially true for small and cryptic taxa such as gamasid mites, so that the information on traits that could affect co‐occurrence was, perhaps, simply unavailable. Nevertheless, a tendency to reduced body size overlap was previously found in component and compound communities of mites (Korallo‐Vinarskaya et al ., ). It is thus also possible that the effect of, for example, body size on co‐occurrence is masked by the lack of effects of other multiple traits when all traits were considered together.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is especially true for small and cryptic taxa such as gamasid mites, so that the information on traits that could affect co‐occurrence was, perhaps, simply unavailable. Nevertheless, a tendency to reduced body size overlap was previously found in component and compound communities of mites (Korallo‐Vinarskaya et al ., ). It is thus also possible that the effect of, for example, body size on co‐occurrence is masked by the lack of effects of other multiple traits when all traits were considered together.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…On the contrary, we expected the opposite trend in infracommunities because of the reduced body size overlap of co‐occurring species (Surkova et al ., ). In gamasid mites, the body size distribution of co‐occurring species in infracommunities did not differ from random, whereas in component and compound communities, it indicated body size segregation (Korallo‐Vinarskaya et al ., ). Consequently, we predicted a positive relationship between the strength of species associations and trait dissimilarity in component and compound communities of mites, whereas we did not have any specific expectation regarding infracommunities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Details of sampling procedures are given elsewhere (Stanko 1994, Stanko et al 2002, Krasnov et al 2006b). In total, our database included data on 24 278 individual hosts belonging to 43 species from which 38 511 individual fleas belonging to 37 species were collected (see Stanko et al 2002, Krasnov et al 2006b, 2011b and Korallo‐Vinarskaya et al 2013 for species lists).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Single findings of a mite species on a host species or in a region were considered accidental and were not included in the analyses. This selection resulted in data on 58 mite species used in subsequent analyses, including 21 obligate exclusive haematophagous, 27 obligate non‐ exclusive haematophages, and 10 facultative haematophages (see species list in Korallo‐Vinarskaya et al 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%