Body size and stable isotope composition of zooplankton in the western tropical Atlantic

Abstract

Size-based approaches are paramount tools for the study of marine food webs. Here, we investigated the relationship between zooplankton body size, stable isotope composition and trophic level (TL) along a large-scale onshore-offshore gradient in the western tropical Atlantic. Samples were obtained on the Brazilian continental shelf, slope and in oceanic waters (off Fernando de Noronha archipelago and Rocas Atoll) in September and October 2015. Zooplankton was sieved into five size fractions. Zooplankton was dominated by copepods, except for the largest (>2000 μm) size fraction, that showed a high biovolume of chaetognaths, decapods, and fish larvae. Maximum zooplankton abundance and biovolume was found at the continental slope. POM showed consistently lower δ13C than zooplankton, indicating a selective use of 13C-rich primary food sources by zooplankton. Particulate organic matter (POM) was more 13Cenriched in shelf areas (average: −22.8, −23.6 and − 24.3‰ at the shelf, slope and oceanic islands, respectively), probably due to the higher abundance of diatoms nearshore. POM had δ15N values between 2.5 and 6.9‰ (average: 4.0, 4.9 and 4.2‰ at the shelf, slope and oceanic islands, respectively). Zooplankton δ15N and TL increased with body size. The δ15N of the 200-500 μm size fraction was used as baseline for TL estimation. Oceanic areas (average baseline δ15N = 5.8‰ ± 0.52, n = 14) showed a higher baseline δ15N than the shelf (average = 3.9‰ ± 0.69, n = 9) and the slope areas (average = 3.1‰ ± 0.93, n = 9). In spite of differing baselines, the δ15N data produced a consistent pattern of log-linear increase in TL with increasing size, in all areas. The choice of input trophic enrichment factor (TEF) values only slightly changed the log10 (body size) vs TL slopes, but this choice had a considerable effect on the estimates of predator/prey size ratio (PPSR) and predator/prey mass ratio (PPMR). Using a TEF above 2.3 leads to unrealistic PPSR and PPMR estimates. Overall average slope was 0.59 ± 0.08 TL μm−1 with TEF = 2.3 and 0.42 ± 0.07 TL μm−1 with TEF = 3.2. Highlights► Maximum zooplankton abundance and biovolume was found at the continental slope. ► POM showed lower δ 13 C than zooplankton, indicating selective feeding. ► Zooplankton δ 15 N and trophic level increased with body size. ► Using a δ 15 N trophic enrichment factor above 2.3 leads to unrealistic estimates.

The role of mesopelagic fishes as microplastics vectors across the deep-sea layers from the Southwestern Tropical Atlantic

“…In the Mediterranean Sea, Romeo et al (2016) observed similarities in the size of MPs and the size of the copepods, prey of lanternfishes, suggesting active and selective ingestion of MPs. We observed a similar pattern, as the dimensions of the MPs found in the SWTA were similar to those of common prey of the species (<2 mm), e.g., amphipods and fish larvae in this region (Figueiredo et al, 2020). Through experiments, Li et al (2021) demonstrated that fish could capture MPs passively by breathing but that some of them are also ingested inadvertently due to the similarity between their prey or the tiny sizes, which are hard to distinguish.…”

On the use of acoustic data to characterise the thermohaline stratification in a tropical ocean

“…These results lead us to hypothesize that in regions where the thermocline is 215 highly stratified, and less mixed, some organisms avoid the layer of highest gradient. These results agree with previous studies (Lee et al, 2013) and are also consistent with the fact that, in the SECS in spring, zooplankton biomass is lower than in the WBCS, but organisms are larger (Figueiredo et al, 2020). Larger zooplankton are more likely to inhabit greater depths under more stratified conditions (Hampton et al, 2014).…”

Distribution, vertical migration, and trophic ecology of lanternfishes (Myctophidae) in the Southwestern Tropical Atlantic

“…This pattern is likely driven by the local food availability, as the study area includes several coral reefs, islands, and seamounts that could enhance the larval abundance of several species (CBD, 2014). Indeed, a recent study addressing zooplankton communities in the same location highlights a high biovolume of fish larvae in sample size fractions larger than 2000 µm (Figueiredo et al, 2020). Local differences in food availability also seem to reflect the trophodynamics between myctophids and their potential predators.…”

“…Additionally, our results revealed differences in the oxygen and fluorescence profiles of these areas. Together, all these oceanographic features resulted in significant variations in zooplankton biomass (Figueiredo et al, 2020) and planktonic cnidarian composition (Tosetto et al, 2021).…”