Body size and symbiotic status influence gonad development in Aiptasia pallida anemones

Abstract

Pale anemones (Aiptasia pallida) coexist with dinoflagellates (primarily Symbiodinium minutum) in a mutualistic relationship. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of these symbionts in gonad development of anemone hosts. Symbiotic and aposymbiotic anemones were subjected to light cycles that induced gametogenesis. These anemones were then sampled weekly for nine weeks, and gonad development was analyzed histologically. Anemone size was measured as mean body column diameter, and oocytes or sperm follicles were counted for each anemone. Generalized linear models were used to evaluate the influence of body size and symbiotic status on whether gonads were present and on the number of oocytes or sperm follicles produced. Body size predicted whether gonads were present, with larger anemones being more likely than smaller anemones to develop gonads. Both body size and symbiotic status predicted gonad size, such that larger and symbiotic anemones produced more oocytes and sperm follicles than smaller and aposymbiotic anemones. Overall, only 22 % of aposymbiotic females produced oocytes, whereas 63 % of symbiotic females produced oocytes. Similarly, 6 % of aposymbiotic males produced sperm follicles, whereas 60 % of symbiotic males produced sperm follicles. Thus, while gonads were present in 62 % of symbiotic anemones, they were present in only 11 % of aposymbiotic anemones. These results indicate that dinoflagellate symbionts influence gonad development and thus sexual maturation in both female and male Aiptasia pallida anemones. This finding substantiates and expands our current understanding of the importance of symbionts in the development and physiology of cnidarian hosts.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13199-016-0456-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Seasonal variation in sexual readiness in a facultatively sexual freshwater cnidarian with diapausing eggs

“…First, in a number of facultatively sexual organisms, production of sexual organs depends on body size, with larger individuals being more likely to initiate sex (e.g., sea anemones: Carlisle et al. 2017, Ryan and Miller 2019; hydra: Ngo et al. 2021).…”

Exaiptasia diaphana from the great barrier reef: a valuable resource for coral symbiosis research

“…Since then, studies using E. diaphana have focused on the onset, maintenance, and disruption of symbiosis with Symbiodiniaceae (Belda-Baillie et al 2002;Fransolet et al 2014;Bucher et al 2016;Hillyer et al 2017;Cziesielski et al 2018). E. diaphana has also been used in studies of toxicity (Duckworth et al 2017;Howe et al 2017), ocean acidification (Hoadley et al 2015), disease and probiotics (Alagely et al 2011), and cnidarian development (Chen et al 2008;Grawunder et al 2015;Carlisle et al 2017). Key differences between corals and E. diaphana are the absence of a calcium carbonate skeleton, the constant production of asexual propagates, and the greater ability to survive bleaching events in the latter.…”

Tentacle patterning during Exaiptasia diaphana pedal lacerate development differs between symbiotic and aposymbiotic animals

“…A major advantage of using Aiptasia as a lab model is the ability to maintain adults in the lab without any symbiotic dinoflagellates ( Weis et al, 2008 ; Voolstra, 2013 ; Matthews et al, 2016 ). These aposymbiotic (Apo) anemones can be used as a comparison to symbiotic (Sym) anemones to assess the influence of nutritional and symbiotic status on molecular, cellular, physiological and metabolic processes ( Lehnert et al, 2014 ; Carlisle, Murphy & Roark, 2017 ; Kitchen, Poole & Weis, 2017 ; Matthews et al, 2017 ; Rädecker et al, 2018 ; Sorek et al, 2018 ). Furthermore, Apo anemones can be re-inoculated with Symbiodiniaceae to understand how colonization is influenced by different symbiont species or under different environmental conditions ( Neubauer et al, 2017 ; Gabay, Weis & Davy, 2018 ; Parkinson et al, 2018 ; Matthews et al, 2018 ; Sproles et al, 2020 ; Herrera et al, 2021 ).…”