“…The observed variability of the shell and the rich fossil record probably triggered interest in the group and resulted in quite a large number of studies being published since the beginning of the second half of the 20th Century. These studies focused largely on the underlying evolutionary processes that may have contributed to the observed morphological plasticity of the shell and also influenced the understanding of the paleobiogeography and historical biogeography of the family on different geographical scales (Papp, ; Geary, , ; Glaubrecht, , ; Heller et al., , ; Bandel, ; Heller and Sivan, , ,; Geary et al., , ; Elkarmi and Ismail, ; Bandel et al., ; Neubauer et al., , ,, ). It is therefore surprising that recent members of the group have received relatively little attention in morphology‐based or molecular phylogenetic studies until now, especially because the family, as currently understood, also exhibits an unparalleled Western Palearctic–Zealandian disjunct distribution pattern (see, e.g., Brot, ; Banarescu, ; Glaubrecht, , , ; Neiber and Glaubrecht, ).…”