1999
DOI: 10.1051/gse:19990505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Body size reaction norms in Drosophila melanogaster: temporal stability and genetic architecture in a natural population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For D. melanogaster, this medium prevents any significant variation of morphometrical traits according to larval density (Karan et al, 1999b). Such is not the case for Z. indianus.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…For D. melanogaster, this medium prevents any significant variation of morphometrical traits according to larval density (Karan et al, 1999b). Such is not the case for Z. indianus.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In this case, lines were investigated after four generations in the laboratory. We have evidence (Karan et al, 1999a) that the characteristics of the Bordeaux population remain stable in different years. For the purpose of the present comparison, we investigated only 10 lines from that population.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Population larval density was not accurately determined, but ranged between 100 and 200 adults per vial. The use of a high nutrient food prevents any significant impact of crowding on morphometrical traits (see Karan et al, 1999a).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their work, among-line variances for all five traits tended to be higher at 12°C than at 25°C. In other isofemale line studies, in which thorax and wing length were examined (de Moed et al, 1997;Karan et al, 1999;Imasheva et al, 2000), a clear-cut trend for an increase in the among-line variances at low temperatures was also demonstrated. However, in the experiment with parent-offspring comparisons Sgrò and Hoffmann (1998) did not find a difference between 14°C and 28°C (the latter seems to be a suboptimal rather than a stressful temperature; see for example David et al, 1983) in the genetic variance of wing length, while for developmental time this variance was significantly lower at 14°C.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data suggest that the effect of stressful temperature may be trait-specific and this warns against generalizations about the behaviour of genetic variation under extreme conditions. Heredity (2002) 89, 70-75. doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800104 Imasheva et al, 1998Imasheva et al, , 1999Imasheva et al, , 2000Karan et al, 1999;Loeschcke et al, 1999) in which genetic parameters have been estimated using the isofemale line technique, ie, a modified full-sib design with isofemale lines treated as families (Hoffmann and Parsons, 1988). However, the full-sib design is the least precise among all quantitative genetics methods developed to estimate additive genetic variance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%