2019
DOI: 10.17352/2455-815x.000035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Body weight had highest correlation coefficient with heart girth around the chest under the same farmers feeding conditions for Arsi Bale sheep

Abstract: The study was conducted in Adami Tulu Jido Kombolcha and Bora districts from east Shoa zone as well as Kofele and Asasa from west Arsi zone of Oromia regional state. The objective of this study was to determine the best regression model for live weight estimation to be used by farmers without the use of weighing scale for indigenous sheep breed found in East Shoa and West Arsi zone of Oromia Regional State. Purposive and simple random sampling was employed to select the study kebeles and all the sheep for body… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Testing with the automatic linear model with the best subsets method also showed that CG is in a more fit rank with the lowest information criterion (AICC) value (344.527) compared to BL (436.626) and WH (442.307). These results in line with the study on Wonosobo sheep (Haryanti et al 2015), Arsi Bale sheep (Worku 2019), Kilakarsal sheep (Ravimurugan et al 2013), blackhead Somali sheep (Feyissa et al 2018), Sudanese Shogur sheep (Musa et al 2012), Uda sheep (Yakubu 2012), Washera sheep, Farta sheep (Mekuriaw et al 2013), indigenous Ethiopia sheep (Tesfay et al 2017), Maefur goat (Berhe 2017) that CG is the most suitable body trait for reflecting and predicting body weight.…”
Section: Regression Models Between Body Measurements and Body Weightsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Testing with the automatic linear model with the best subsets method also showed that CG is in a more fit rank with the lowest information criterion (AICC) value (344.527) compared to BL (436.626) and WH (442.307). These results in line with the study on Wonosobo sheep (Haryanti et al 2015), Arsi Bale sheep (Worku 2019), Kilakarsal sheep (Ravimurugan et al 2013), blackhead Somali sheep (Feyissa et al 2018), Sudanese Shogur sheep (Musa et al 2012), Uda sheep (Yakubu 2012), Washera sheep, Farta sheep (Mekuriaw et al 2013), indigenous Ethiopia sheep (Tesfay et al 2017), Maefur goat (Berhe 2017) that CG is the most suitable body trait for reflecting and predicting body weight.…”
Section: Regression Models Between Body Measurements and Body Weightsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In the single predictor, the correlation between BW and CG is the highest (0.836) compared to BL and WH. The highest correlation between BW and CG compared BL and WH were expressed on Cornigliese sheep (Sabbioni et al 2020), blackhead Somali sheep (Feyissa et al 2018), Mengali sheep (Eyduran et al 2017), Kilakarsal sheep (Ravimurugan et al 2013), Uda sheep (Yakubu 2012), Arsi Bale sheep (Worku 2019), male Afar goat (Tekle 2014), female Etawah Grade goat (Dakhlan et al 2020) and Nguni cattle (Tyasi et al 2020). The CG becomes the best predictor for BW on the livestock can be possible due to the CG development was aligned with the ribs, muscles, and fats development, where an increase in the proportion of carcass fat and rib-eye weight were related to the growth and fat accumulation (Dakhlan et al 2020).…”
Section: Correlation Between Body Measurements and Body Weightmentioning
confidence: 99%