2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Body weight is a strong predictor of postural stability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

25
298
8
55

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 417 publications
(386 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
25
298
8
55
Order By: Relevance
“…Significant alteration of these circumference and width dimensions of the females with posterior balance strategy might be responsible for adoption of aforementioned hip strategy instead of ankle strategy as both of these also contribute to peripheral increase of total body fat and weight. The previous literature [27,31,32] supports the poor balance with the significant increase in BMI confining to the obese category whereas in contrary to that, the mean BMI of posterior balance strategy female in our study falls within the overweight category. The higher percentage of body fat in Asians at lower BMI [33,34] as well as an increased prevalence of truncal fat, might be the reason behind the presentation of posterior type instead of ideal sagittal neutral balance strategy [35].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Significant alteration of these circumference and width dimensions of the females with posterior balance strategy might be responsible for adoption of aforementioned hip strategy instead of ankle strategy as both of these also contribute to peripheral increase of total body fat and weight. The previous literature [27,31,32] supports the poor balance with the significant increase in BMI confining to the obese category whereas in contrary to that, the mean BMI of posterior balance strategy female in our study falls within the overweight category. The higher percentage of body fat in Asians at lower BMI [33,34] as well as an increased prevalence of truncal fat, might be the reason behind the presentation of posterior type instead of ideal sagittal neutral balance strategy [35].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 86%
“…Adaptive shortening is often considered with functional overuse. Muscles maintained in a shortened position lose sarcomeres and become weak and infiltrated with [26,27] who were obese or extremely obese, and in all of these populations, body mass influenced postural stability. Shimokata et al [28] found that changes in waist and hip circumferences correlated directly with changes in weight, hence significant increase in waist and hip circumference of females with posterior balance is mainly contributing to the total body weight.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, a strong relationship (R 2 00.52) between weight and postural instability has been observed ). Hue et al (2007) observed that young individuals who are obese and overweight swayed at a faster velocity than normal weight individuals. More tellingly, when obese and overweight individuals lost weight, their balance control improved, and a strong relationship (R 2 00.65) was noted between the amount of weight lost and the improvement in balance control (Teasdale et al 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings indicate that a high BMI is associated with reduced postural control and balance after a TKR. Because being overweight or obese is a risk factor for poor postural stability (56)(57)(58), and because changes in body weight influence balance control (59,60), it is reasonable to expect that overweight and obese patients perform more poorly in the FRT and SLS test compared with patients with a normal BMI, because such tasks are highly dependent on postural stability and balance control. Previous studies have shown that the performance of postural stabilitydependent mobility tasks improves after balance-based post-TKR rehabilitation (24,38), which is consistent with the significant improvements in the FRT and SLS test results for all of the BMI groups at the 2-month and 6-month post-TKR followup assessments in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%