2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0375-9601(01)00677-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bohmian trajectories for photons

Abstract: The first examples of Bohmian trajectories for photons have been worked out for simple situations, using the Kemmer-Duffin-Harishchandra formalism.Comment: 7 pages, Latex, Comments about time-like properties of Bohmian velocities added. Revised version accepted for publication in Physics Letters

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
91
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
9
91
2
Order By: Relevance
“…4 with our data, in In Fig.6 we report the swept with a larger iris (6 mm) scanning the whole diffraction This last result is at variance with the dBB prediction for coincidences calculated by [8][9][10], where the coincidence signal is predicted to be strictly zero when the two detectors are in the same semiplane with respect to the double slit symmetry axis (this configuration was purposely chosen since it has the largest coincidence signal for this case), as discussed in the previous paragraph. In particular, when the centre of the lens of the first detector is placed -1.7 cm after the median symmetry axis of the two slits (recall, the minus means to the left of the symmetry axis looking towards the crystal) and the second detector is kept at -5.5 cm, with 35 acquisitions of 30' each we obtained 78 ± 10 coincidences per 30 minutes after background subtraction, ruling out a null result at nearly eight standard deviations.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…4 with our data, in In Fig.6 we report the swept with a larger iris (6 mm) scanning the whole diffraction This last result is at variance with the dBB prediction for coincidences calculated by [8][9][10], where the coincidence signal is predicted to be strictly zero when the two detectors are in the same semiplane with respect to the double slit symmetry axis (this configuration was purposely chosen since it has the largest coincidence signal for this case), as discussed in the previous paragraph. In particular, when the centre of the lens of the first detector is placed -1.7 cm after the median symmetry axis of the two slits (recall, the minus means to the left of the symmetry axis looking towards the crystal) and the second detector is kept at -5.5 cm, with 35 acquisitions of 30' each we obtained 78 ± 10 coincidences per 30 minutes after background subtraction, ruling out a null result at nearly eight standard deviations.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The main result of our experiment is that our scheme realises the configuration recently suggested by two theoretical groups [8][9][10] to test the de Broglie-Bohm (dBB) theory against standard quantum mechanics (SQM). dBB [11] is a deterministic theory where the hidden variable (determining the evolution of a specific system) is the position of the particle, which follows a perfectly defined trajectory in its motion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The subsequent experimental implementations follow the same scheme. See for instance [9,10]. In the present paper only the first part of the experimental setup is considered as the quantum system.…”
Section: B Weak Measurement Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%