Film and Nucleate Boiling Processes 2011
DOI: 10.1520/stp49342t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boiling Heat Transfer: An Overview of Longstanding and New Challenges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such approach cannot be used for transient nucleate boiling processes where heat transfer coefficients reach 200,000 W/m 2 K and more [11,14]. A long ago, some incorrectness has been made by metallurgical engineers in FSU who used effective HTC to calculate Bi 0.25.…”
Section: Lumped-heat-capacity Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such approach cannot be used for transient nucleate boiling processes where heat transfer coefficients reach 200,000 W/m 2 K and more [11,14]. A long ago, some incorrectness has been made by metallurgical engineers in FSU who used effective HTC to calculate Bi 0.25.…”
Section: Lumped-heat-capacity Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calculations of HTCs were made for maximal critical heat flux density of water salt solutions which was equal to 15 MW/ m 2 [2]. Dimensionless correlations of authors [11,14] were used for this purpose. As seen from Table 2, real HTCs are very large when heat flux density approaches the critical value 15 MW/m 2 .…”
Section: The Main Differences Between Real and Effective Heat Transfementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As known, the real heat transfer coefficient during transient nucleate boiling process is evaluated as a ratio of the heat flux density produced by bubbles to the overheat of the boundary layer [4][5][6] 2It cannot be used for temperature gradients calculation. As seen from Table 1, the real HTC is almost 7 times larger as compared with the effective HTC [4,6]. According to author [4], the average heat flux density q during nucleate boiling is proportional to the cube of temperature difference…”
Section: Intense Quenching When Cooling In Low Concentration Of Watermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calculations of HTCs were made for maximal critical heat flux density of water salt solutions which was equal to 15 MW/m 2 [4]. Dimensionless correlations of authors [4,6] were used for this purpose. Tolubinsky Shekriladze Average 10 152248 176546 164397 20 193929 243641 218785 40 224989 241615 233302 60 271273 271323 271298 Results of calculations presented in Table 2 actually are experimental data because dimensionless equations of Tolubinsky and Kutateladze are based on thousand of accurate experiments [4,5].…”
Section: Intense Quenching When Cooling In Low Concentration Of Watermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation