Handbook of Thermal Science and Engineering 2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-26695-4_43
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boiling on Enhanced Surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also relevant to point out that Hsu proposed a model for the size range of effective nucleation cavities on boiling surfaces based on a transient heat transfer analysis, and demonstrated that the size range of effective nucleation cavities on boiling surfaces is ∼1–100 μm, which is orders of magnitude larger than the effective nucleation cavities for gas-evolving surfaces (∼0.01–1 μm) determined by our proposed model. This explains why the nucleation site densities on boiling surfaces (10 4 –10 6 sites/m 2 ) are far lower than electrochemical gas-evolving surfaces (10 7 –10 9 sites/m 2 ). The orders of magnitude difference on the sizes of effective nucleation cavities can be attributed to the fact that the typical thermal boundary layer thickness on boiling surfaces (∼25 to 250 μm) is much larger than the concentration boundary layer thickness (∼0.2 to 5 μm).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is also relevant to point out that Hsu proposed a model for the size range of effective nucleation cavities on boiling surfaces based on a transient heat transfer analysis, and demonstrated that the size range of effective nucleation cavities on boiling surfaces is ∼1–100 μm, which is orders of magnitude larger than the effective nucleation cavities for gas-evolving surfaces (∼0.01–1 μm) determined by our proposed model. This explains why the nucleation site densities on boiling surfaces (10 4 –10 6 sites/m 2 ) are far lower than electrochemical gas-evolving surfaces (10 7 –10 9 sites/m 2 ). The orders of magnitude difference on the sizes of effective nucleation cavities can be attributed to the fact that the typical thermal boundary layer thickness on boiling surfaces (∼25 to 250 μm) is much larger than the concentration boundary layer thickness (∼0.2 to 5 μm).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This explains why the nucleation site densities on boiling surfaces (10 4 −10 6 sites/m 2 ) 43−45 are far lower than electrochemical gas-evolving surfaces (10 7 −10 9 sites/m 2 ). 46−48 The orders of magnitude difference on the sizes of effective nucleation cavities can be attributed to the fact that the typical thermal boundary layer thickness on boiling surfaces (∼25 to 250 μm 49 ) is much larger than the concentration boundary layer thickness (∼0.2 to 5 μm 24 ).…”
Section: Effects Of the Contact Angle And Cone Angle On The Size Rang...mentioning
confidence: 99%