1990
DOI: 10.1016/0017-9310(90)90112-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boiling regimes in a closed two-phase thermosyphon

Abstract: Abstract-Experimentalresults and an analytical model on the boiling mechanisms in a closed two-phase thermosyphon are presented in order to define the frontiers between the main boiling regimes and, in particular, the frontier between intermittent boiling and fully-developed boiling. The boiling regimes are classified on the basis of the frequency of bubble nucleation and the ratio of bubble diameter to device diameter. A criterion for the intermittent/developed-boiling frontier is based on the ratio of the bu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Explosive eruption can be recognized clearly by the sharp falls in the heated section temperature and the sudden rises in riser channel temperature. The temperatures in the heated section experience continuous fluctuations, but these are limited to 0.3 K. These fluctuations, which present higher frequencies compared with that of riser channel, are due to the intrinsically stochastic nature of boiling which was reported by Niro et al [31] that nucleation frequencies (<0.1 Hz) which were related to high liquid superheats brought about the intermittent boiling regime. It should be noted that the maximum and the lowest temperature during each cycle in the riser channel are lower when compared with those of the heated section, and there is relatively a larger temperature drop than that in the heated section.…”
Section: Typical Flow Phenomenonmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Explosive eruption can be recognized clearly by the sharp falls in the heated section temperature and the sudden rises in riser channel temperature. The temperatures in the heated section experience continuous fluctuations, but these are limited to 0.3 K. These fluctuations, which present higher frequencies compared with that of riser channel, are due to the intrinsically stochastic nature of boiling which was reported by Niro et al [31] that nucleation frequencies (<0.1 Hz) which were related to high liquid superheats brought about the intermittent boiling regime. It should be noted that the maximum and the lowest temperature during each cycle in the riser channel are lower when compared with those of the heated section, and there is relatively a larger temperature drop than that in the heated section.…”
Section: Typical Flow Phenomenonmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The circulating flow resulting from ebullition may be unable to effectively replenish all the fluid between the tightly-grouped fins. As a result, heated fluid does not get carried away quickly and the waiting time required to heat the small volume of liquid between the fins to temperatures suitable for bubble formation is reduced [9]. This may increase the frequency of bubble departure.…”
Section: Effect Of Fin Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the boiling regimes of water and acetone at low pressure in a closed two-phase thermosiphon were examined [9]. Experimental and analytical results of the boiling mechanisms were used to examine the regime between intermittent and fully-developed boiling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydrophobic spots with a rough texture may contribute significantly to bubble nucleation because of the accumulation of entrapped vapour. In other words, the larger roughness and thickness of the coated-spot on the evaporator surface can lead to facilitated initial nucleation and lowered wall superheat at the onset of nucleate boiling (Forrest et al, 2010;Niro and Beretta, 1990;Parker and Genk, 2005). The comparison of bubble behaviours on surfaces Type X, Type Y, and Type D at heat fluxes of 130 kW/m 2 and 200 kW/m 2 are presented in Fig. 14.…”
Section: Effect Of Hydrophobic Coating Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was considered that the bubble departure time and departure radius increased substantially with decreasing operating pressure (1975). Niro et al (1990) showed, by combining the ClausiusClapeyron equation with the Laplace equation, the superheat necessary for bubble nucleation at low pressures was much higher than that at high pressures. The average departure diameter increases with decreasing pressure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%