2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00334-011-0305-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bolboschoenus glaucus (Lam.) S.G. Smith, a new species in the flora of the ancient Near East

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hillman suggested that these were brought to the site to be used as food. Bolboschoenus nutlets were also common at Tell Abu Hureyra (Wollstonecroft et al 2011), a late Natufian site where a high number of grinding versus pounding tools was also observed (Wright 1994: table 7;Hillman 2000;Moore 2000). Furthermore recent phytolith evidence from a late Natufian bedrock feature at Raqefet cave may also suggest tuber exploitation (Power et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hillman suggested that these were brought to the site to be used as food. Bolboschoenus nutlets were also common at Tell Abu Hureyra (Wollstonecroft et al 2011), a late Natufian site where a high number of grinding versus pounding tools was also observed (Wright 1994: table 7;Hillman 2000;Moore 2000). Furthermore recent phytolith evidence from a late Natufian bedrock feature at Raqefet cave may also suggest tuber exploitation (Power et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This consequently emphasises that we should not assume that ground stone tools were primarily used for the processing of cereals or nuts. The availability and palatability of tubers and nutlets (Kraybill 1977;Hillman et al 1989 and references therein;Wright 1994: Wollstonecroft et al 2008Wollstonecroft et al , 2011 shows that these plants were likely just as important a food source as cereals. This could reflect certain resource specialization during the Natufian (Power et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For an ethnobotanical comparison of the use of Schoenoplectus we consider both Bolboschoenus maritimus (sea club rush) and Scirpus (wood club rush), as the nomenclature of Schoenoplectus has changed quite a lot within the family of Cyperaceae. Sea club rush is recovered frequently from ancient sites in the Middle East and interpreted as a wild food plant (Wollstonecroft et al 2008(Wollstonecroft et al , 2011. Seeds from several species of the genus Scirpus are used by Native Americans in the same way as described for water lily and pond lily (Moerman 1998, pp.…”
Section: Upgrading the Current State Of Knowledge Of Neolithic Crop Gmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, it is well documented in the Near East, that the nutlets, shoots and tubers of Bolboschoenus maritimus or sea club-rush, as well as those of Bolboschoenus glaucus, were eaten in prehistory ( Wollstonecroft et al, 2008). Nutlets of B. glaucus, widely reported from Pre-Pottery sites in West Asia, might also have sometimes been eaten ( Wollstonecroft et al, 2011). The use of rhizomes and tubers as food are frequently referred to as 'famine food.'…”
Section: Subsistence Regime: Gathered Food Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%