2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10071-021-01587-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bold and bright: shy and supple? The effect of habitat type on personality–cognition covariance in the Aegean wall lizard (Podarcis erhardii)

Abstract: Animals exhibit considerable and consistent among-individual variation in cognitive abilities, even within a population. Recent studies have attempted to address this variation using insights from the field of animal personality. Generally, it is predicted that animals with "faster" personalities (bolder, explorative, neophilic) should exhibit faster but less flexible learning. However, the empirical evidence for a link between cognitive style and personality is mixed. One possible reason for such conflicting … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 135 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, neophobia is studied across vertebrates but research in lizards is scarce (Crane et al 2020). A study in the Aegean wall lizard (Podarcis erhardii) tested object neophobia by measuring the time it took lizards to consume food next to an unfamiliar object (De Meester et al 2022). Other studies in lizards focussed on neophilia, the attraction towards novelty (Takola et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, neophobia is studied across vertebrates but research in lizards is scarce (Crane et al 2020). A study in the Aegean wall lizard (Podarcis erhardii) tested object neophobia by measuring the time it took lizards to consume food next to an unfamiliar object (De Meester et al 2022). Other studies in lizards focussed on neophilia, the attraction towards novelty (Takola et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Repeatability of responses towards novel objects and novel foods in corvids was calculated around 0.5 (Miller et al, 2022). In lizards, studies have found repeatability of around 0.4 (Damas-Moreira et al, 2019;De Meester et al, 2022) but also similar low repeatability of about 0.1 (Damas-Moreira, Riley, Harris, & Whiting, 2019). Damas-Moreira and colleagues (2019) interpreted this low repeatability as evidence for flexibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…birds: Milvago chimango, Guido et al, 2017) but not all studies found such a link (e.g. fish: Neolamprologus pulcher, Bannier, Tebbich, & Taborsky, 2017; lizards: Podarcis erhardii, De Meester, Pafilis, & Van Damme, 2022). Finally, species differences in neophobia can be explained by the trophic level they inhabit (Crane & Ferrari, 2017), diet (Mettke-Hofmann, Winkler, & Leisler, 2002), habitat urbanisation (Miller et al, 2022) and their tendency to exploit new habitats (invasiveness) or migrate (Greenberg & Mettke-Hofmann, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result, despite our conditional modes losing the error around the point estimates, our models using these estimates were the most robust we could fit and draw inference from. Previous research has also consistently used this approach (without the associated error) in personality studies as response variables 26 , 27 , population-level/fixed effects 28 , 29 , or as variables in correlations and principal component analysis 30 . However, we do acknowledge that losing the associated error from the conditional modes may contribute to anticonservative estimates in the models analysing occurrence patterns.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%