2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bold attitude makes male urban feral domestic cats more vulnerable to Feline Immunodeficiency Virus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
102
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
7
102
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sex distribution results agreed with the characteristic epidemiology of both infections and with data from pre- vious studies [2,4,[6][7][8][9]. In FeLV infection, the disease was more severe in males than in females, as a higher percentage of males than females presented clinical signs, and the mean clinical score was 4.4 and 3.7, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Sex distribution results agreed with the characteristic epidemiology of both infections and with data from pre- vious studies [2,4,[6][7][8][9]. In FeLV infection, the disease was more severe in males than in females, as a higher percentage of males than females presented clinical signs, and the mean clinical score was 4.4 and 3.7, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Since the initial report, serosurveys of contemporary and banked cat serum samples have revealed that the virus has been present in the domestic cat population since at least 1968 (32), with the current prevalence in the United States ranging from 1 to 15% and approaching 50% in at least one population (59,279,379,408). Feral cats, animals with outdoor access, and animals presented for undiagnosed illness are more likely to be infected than are indoor neutered house cats (32,234,265).…”
Section: Fiv Infection Of Domestic Cats Causes Aidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…coping style) can mediate individual exposure risk, and that those same behavioral syndromes are often associated with distinct physiological traits as well (e.g. hypothalamicpituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis reactivity and stress levels) (Natoli et al 2005, Koolhaas 2008. Finally, covariation between infectiousness and contact rate can arise when pathogens alter host behavior to make it easier for the pathogen to spread between hosts (particularly in trophically transmitted parasites, Berdoy et al 2000) or indirectly through sickness behaviors that reduce host activity levels such as fever, lethargy, and limited foraging (Adelman et al 2014, Welicky andSikkel 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%