BOLD responses in reward regions to hypothetical and imaginary monetary rewards

Abstract

Monetary rewards are uniquely human. Because money is easy to quantify and present visually, it is the reward of choice for most fMRI studies, even though it cannot be handed over to participants inside the scanner. A typical fMRI study requires hundreds of trials and thus small amounts of monetary rewards per trial (e.g. 5p) if all trials are to be treated equally. However, small payoffs can have detrimental effects on performance due to their limited buying power. Hypothetical monetary rewards can overcome the limitations of smaller monetary rewards but it is less well known whether predictors of hypothetical rewards activate reward regions. In two experiments, visual stimuli were associated with hypothetical monetary rewards. In Experiment 1, we used stimuli predicting either visually presented or imagined hypothetical monetary rewards, together with non-rewarding control pictures. Activations to reward predictive stimuli occurred in reward regions, namely the medial orbitofrontal cortex and midbrain. In Experiment 2, we parametrically varied the amount of visually presented hypothetical monetary reward keeping constant the amount of actually received reward. Graded activation in midbrain was observed to stimuli predicting increasing hypothetical rewards. The results demonstrate the efficacy of using hypothetical monetary rewards in fMRI studies.

Instrumental Divergence and the Value of Control

“…Since monetary rewards were fictive, these conditions provide important criterion checks, confirming that participants were sensitive to differences in expected monetary pay-offs. Consistent with a previously demonstrated correspondence between real and fictive monetary rewards, in both behavioral choice and neural correlates789, a planned comparison revealed that participants’ choices were indeed in accordance with expected monetary rewards: the proportion of high- over zero-divergence choices was significantly greater in UBS than in UBO blocks, t ( 23 ) =  4 . 88 , p  <  0 .…”

Modulation of smoking and decision-making behaviors with transcranial direct current stimulation in tobacco smokers: A preliminary study

“…Second, real and virtual rewards appear to be processed in a similar way. For instance, it has been shown that real and virtual reward induced similar behavioral responses (Bowman and Turnbull, 2003) and brain activation patterns (Miyapuram et al, 2012). Future work should further characterize smokers as slow and fast metabolizers using H3/cotinine ratios as this might influence the findings.…”

Relationship Reciprocation Modulates Resource Allocation in Adolescent Social Networks: Developmental Effects

“…The mDG was identical to that in Study 1 except we instructed participants to imagine they had £100 to distribute among their network. The use of hypothetical rather than real money was motivated by the preferences of the school from which the sample was recruited and based on evidence that hypothetical money effectively motivates participant behavior (Miyapuram, Tobler, Gregorios-Pippas, & Schultz, 2012).…”