Grimes et al., 1969a;Gerik et al., 1996). While Grimes et al. (1969a) reported that lint percentage decreased as Understanding how moisture deficit stress alters cotton (Gossypthe soil moisture level increased, Kimball and Mauney ium hirsutum L.) reproductive growth and yield component development would provide insight into the current yield stagnation problem (1993) found no response in lint percentage to varying plaguing U.S. cotton producers. Objectives were to document the effects soil moisture levels. Grimes et al. (1969a) and Gerik of moisture deficit stress on reproductive growth, lint yield, yield compo- et al. (1996) also reported that boll mass decreased in nents, boll distribution, and fiber quality. Field studies were conducted response to moisture deficits. Saranga et al. (1998) showed from 1998 through 2001 utilizing eight diverse genotypes, which were that drought conditions cause more motes (cotton ovules grown under both dryland and irrigated conditions. Weekly white that fail to ripen into mature seeds) to be produced; bloom counts, nodes above white bloom, lint yield, yield components, therefore, one would suspect that seed formation would end-of-season plant mapping, and fiber quality data were collected. also be affected. With the exception of one year of data Genotypes responded similarly to the two soil moisture regimes for reported by McMichael and Hesketh (1982), the reall of the parameters evaluated. Irrigation delayed cutout, the slowing sponse of seed mass, number of seeds per boll, and the of vegetative growth due to strong reproductive demand for assimilate, an average of 6 d. This delayed maturity enabled those plants to