2016
DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bond Activation by Metal–Carbene Complexes in the Gas Phase

Abstract: "Bare" metal-carbene complexes, when generated in the gas phase and exposed to thermal reactions under (near) single-collision conditions, exhibit rather unique reactivities in addition to the well-known metathesis and cyclopropanation processes. For example, at room temperature the unligated [AuCH2](+) complex brings about efficient C-C coupling with methane to produce C2Hx (x = 4, 6), and the couple [TaCH2](+)/CO2 gives rise to the generation of the acetic acid equivalent CH2═C═O. Entirely unprecedented is t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
61
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
2
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the reaction energetics were found to be similar, the difference in reactivity is driven by a higher kinetic barrier for PaO − with background gases in the ion trap (Figure 2b). The corresponding PaO 4 − product is not apparent in Figure 2a. To confirm that UO 4 − results from the reaction of UO 2 (C 2 O 4 ) − with O 2 , an excess of isotopically labeled 18 O 2 was introduced into the ion trap.…”
Section: ■ Computational Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Given the reaction energetics were found to be similar, the difference in reactivity is driven by a higher kinetic barrier for PaO − with background gases in the ion trap (Figure 2b). The corresponding PaO 4 − product is not apparent in Figure 2a. To confirm that UO 4 − results from the reaction of UO 2 (C 2 O 4 ) − with O 2 , an excess of isotopically labeled 18 O 2 was introduced into the ion trap.…”
Section: ■ Computational Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The corresponding PaO 4 − product is not apparent in Figure 2a. To confirm that UO 4 − results from the reaction of UO 2 (C 2 O 4 ) − with O 2 , an excess of isotopically labeled 18 O 2 was introduced into the ion trap. The result is shown in Figure 3, where the dominant product peak at 306 m/ z corresponds to reaction of UO 2 (C 2 O 4 ) − with 18 O 2 to yield UO 2 18 O 2 (unless specified otherwise, O refers to the 99.8% natural abundance 16 O isotope).…”
Section: ■ Computational Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations