2006
DOI: 10.1617/s11527-006-9115-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bond of a strand in a cementitious matrix

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The main types of test configurations known from literature include one-sided and double-sided pull-out tests. For example, onesided tests were conducted by Banholzer [18], wherein single yarns were embedded in a concrete matrix at one end and in an epoxy resin block at the other. This type of test is, however, said to yield a behaviour that is incomparable of that of a textile mesh [14].…”
Section: Pull-out Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main types of test configurations known from literature include one-sided and double-sided pull-out tests. For example, onesided tests were conducted by Banholzer [18], wherein single yarns were embedded in a concrete matrix at one end and in an epoxy resin block at the other. This type of test is, however, said to yield a behaviour that is incomparable of that of a textile mesh [14].…”
Section: Pull-out Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pull-out test, an established method to determine shear bond characteristics, is used to examine bonding behaviour (Bannister et al 1995;Brandt 1995;Banholzer 2006;Frybort et al 2010). Analysis of the load-displacement curve helps determine the location where de-bonding occurs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) and (2), r P and e P are calculated assuming the load is shared evenly between the bundles in the composite and that the stress distribution over the bundle cross section is uniform. Although previous studies [26] and [48] have demonstrated that these two assumptions do not hold, similar equations are often used to compare composites with different widths [14,28] or different fiber-tomatrix reinforcement ratios and have also been proposed within procedures to provide engineering parameters for externally bonded FRCM reinforcement [17,49]. Table 1 reports the maximum load P max , the average global slip at the maximum load g P max i computed as the average of the slip measured on each fiber bundle g i (measured using ICS), the average global slip at maximum load g P max computed as the average of the two LVDT measurements (specimen C_28_2 only), the axial stress in the longitudinal fiber bundles at the maximum load r P max P determined by Eq.…”
Section: General Behavior Failure Mode and Maximum Loadmentioning
confidence: 86%