1996
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.53.12694
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bond-order potentials: Theory and implementation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
165
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(167 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
165
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Full details have been published elsewhere [1,6,7], but we need to point out that complex intermetallics cannot be described by classical pair functionals such as embedded atom models, partly because neglected angular forces are responsible for Cauchy pressure anomalies that abound in intermetallics and partly because they cannot reliably predict planar fault energies and hence the stable core structures of dislocations. In contrast, bond order potentials are fitted to all the independent elastic constants and the potential we use for TiAl is known to reproduce planar fault energies that are fully consistent with those predicted by the local density functional theory [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Full details have been published elsewhere [1,6,7], but we need to point out that complex intermetallics cannot be described by classical pair functionals such as embedded atom models, partly because neglected angular forces are responsible for Cauchy pressure anomalies that abound in intermetallics and partly because they cannot reliably predict planar fault energies and hence the stable core structures of dislocations. In contrast, bond order potentials are fitted to all the independent elastic constants and the potential we use for TiAl is known to reproduce planar fault energies that are fully consistent with those predicted by the local density functional theory [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the MEAM potential for Pu, this MGPT potential has been demonstrated to capture reasonably well the phonon dispersion curves, although the anomalous softening of the transverse 111 phonon at the L point is not reproduced. Another possible candidate for the construction of a better interatomic potential is the tight-binding-based description within the bond order potential (BOP) [32] that has been shown to be imminently suitable for transition metals crystallizing in the bcc structure with approximately half-filled d bands (V, Nb, Mo, Ta, W) and α Fe. Although this BOP is not currently available, the first step was undertaken by Hachiya [33] who constructed a tight-binding description of fcc α phase of Th and δ Pu, both of which are characterized by approximately halffilled f orbitals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intersite elements of the Hamiltonian matrix are given as usually in terms of the radial bond integrals and Slater-Koster angular functions. The elements of the screening function S = (I + O) −1 can be obtained analytically using the same formalism as that employed in the original BOP theory [3]. Analytical expression for the elements of the screening function…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atomistic calculations employing these methods are fast enough to treat systems of particles that are much larger than those attainable in ab-initio DFT based calculations. In recent years the tight-binding method with the orthogonal basis and two-center bond (hopping) integrals has been reformulated in terms of Bond-Order Potentials (BOP) [3]. This linear scaling TB scheme does not require use of periodic boundary conditions and all the calculations are performed in the real space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%