2009
DOI: 10.1021/jp906341r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bond Paths Are Not Chemical Bonds

Abstract: This account takes to task papers that criticize the definition of a bond path as a criterion for the bonding between the atoms it links by mistakenly identifying it with a chemical bond. It is argued that the notion of a chemical bond is too restrictive to account for the physics underlying the broad spectrum of interactions between atoms and molecules that determine the properties of matter. A bond path on the other hand, as well as being accessible to experimental verification and subject to the theorems of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
479
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 579 publications
(494 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
10
479
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The corresponding H-H interactions in the parent biphenyl have led to intense debates in the literature in order to characterize them either as repulsive or attractive. 53,54 There are also debates in the literature about the nature of phenanthrene H-H interactions. 55 By changing the hydrogen atoms for fluorine atoms, one may expect increasingly repulsive interactions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corresponding H-H interactions in the parent biphenyl have led to intense debates in the literature in order to characterize them either as repulsive or attractive. 53,54 There are also debates in the literature about the nature of phenanthrene H-H interactions. 55 By changing the hydrogen atoms for fluorine atoms, one may expect increasingly repulsive interactions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular the properties of the electron density function in the so-called bond critical point (BCP, the (3, -1) saddle point on electron density curvature being a minimum in the direction of the atomic interaction line and a maximum in two directions perpendicular to it) seem to be valuable information for chemists, since it was proven in many papers that the chemical bonding can be characterized and classified on the basis of electron density characteristics measured in BCPs [24,[39][40][41][42]. It was emphasized in many papers dealing with QTAIM applications that the presence of a bond path (BP, the line linking points of maximum electron density along the direction of the bond) linking a pair of atoms and the BCP corresponding to it fulfills the sufficient and necessary condition requiring that the atoms be bonded to one another [43,44]. The above statement can be used as the universal criterion for the presence of the chemical bond, no matter what kind of bond it is.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bond paths are better thought of as representing interacting atoms rather than any actual chemical bond. 172 QTAIM identifies all atomic interactions as "local pairings of the densities of opposite spin electrons" 173 which, in fact, covers all non-covalent interactions. However, when the density is computed from DFT, which only roughly accounts for dispersion, it becomes unclear whether the van der Waals interactions remain correctly depicted by QTAIM.…”
Section: A Qtaim and Interacting Quantum Atomsmentioning
confidence: 99%