2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bond-slip behaviour of concrete-filled stainless steel circular hollow section tubes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies about frictional behaviour between steel and concrete were presented below. Chen et al [1] noted that the gradually decreasing of slipping force between core concrete and steel tube at shear failure subjected to cyclic push out tests charged in same direction within experimental results of 32 concrete filled tube specimens. The strength constitute subcomponents of shear resistance were indicated as interface friction force and chemical adhesive force with mechanical interlock force with the ratio of %70 and %30, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Some studies about frictional behaviour between steel and concrete were presented below. Chen et al [1] noted that the gradually decreasing of slipping force between core concrete and steel tube at shear failure subjected to cyclic push out tests charged in same direction within experimental results of 32 concrete filled tube specimens. The strength constitute subcomponents of shear resistance were indicated as interface friction force and chemical adhesive force with mechanical interlock force with the ratio of %70 and %30, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Meanwhile, among many types, CFST columns using circular steel tubes are considered more effective in obtaining high compressive strength and ductility. In the previous study on circular CFST columns, primary research focuses include diameter-to-thickness ratio of the steel tube (Sakino et al, 2004;Han et al, 2005;Gupta et al, 2007;Abed et al, 2013), concrete strength (Giakoumelis and Lam, 2004;Yu et al, 2007;Lam and Gardner, 2008), bond behavior between steel tube and concrete (Xue et al, 2012;Liao et al, 2013;Tao et al, 2016;Chen et al, 2017), etc. Many studies conclude that the confinement effect from the exterior steel tube to the infill concrete is the key parameter in CFST columns and various means to enhance the confinement effect have been reported (Hu et al, 2011;Ho and Lai, 2013;Lai and Ho, 2015;He et al, 2018;Shen et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e rougher the inner surface of the steel tube is, the higher the bond strength is, and the interface length does not influence the bond strength of CFSTs. Xiushu et al [15], Yongjian and Jianjun [16], and Chen et al [17] determine through reciprocating push-out tests on CFST specimens that the bond stress distribution is nonuniform along the length of the tube. e frictional resistance is the dominant mechanism contributing to bond strength, followed by mechanical interlocking action, whereas the effect of chemical bonding action appears to be limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%