2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2004.tb00016.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bond Strengths of Current Adhesive Systems on Intact and Ground Enamel

Abstract: The two-step adhesives showed significantly higher bond strengths than did the one-step adhesive. When applying the total-etching system, no significant differences in bond strength were demonstrated between bonding to intact and to ground enamel.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

10
45
2
24

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
10
45
2
24
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences in composition, tubular density, intrinsic moisture and dentinal permeability (21) between primary and permanent teeth may be responsible for the lower bond strength values obtained in sound primary dentin, which were similar to those of previous studies that also found worst results to primary dentin (8,9).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Differences in composition, tubular density, intrinsic moisture and dentinal permeability (21) between primary and permanent teeth may be responsible for the lower bond strength values obtained in sound primary dentin, which were similar to those of previous studies that also found worst results to primary dentin (8,9).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Some studies have shown lower bond strength values to primary dentin (8,9), while others have found similar values (10) or even superior performance in primary dentin (11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 However, as the etching pattern of self-etch adhesives is not as well defined as that provided by phosphoric acid, [3][4][5] several studies have attempted to make the enamel substrate more receptive to bonding via abrasion, similar to what is done during a bevel or cavity preparation. Promising results were reported by some authors, [3][4][6][7] while others did not reach the same conclusions. [8][9] Differences in the way the enamel was prepared and material-related factors, such acidity, [9][10] can explain the lack of consensus among investigators and deserves further investigation.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…[3][4][5] Some studies have demonstrated that abrading the enamel during a bevel or cavity preparation results in the substrate being more receptive to bonding with two-step self-etch systems. [3][4][6][7] However, this is not consensual in the literature, since other researchers have not detected any difference in the self-etch systems' performance when these materials were applied on ground and unground enamel. [8][9] Improvements in resin-enamel bond strength after enamel preparation were only detected for two of the four self-etch adhesive systems tested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The results of the effectiveness of self-etch adhesive systems when compared with etch&rinse adhesives are contradictory. [5][6] Some perform similarly between systems, [6][7] while others suggest a superiority of the etch&rinse materials. 5,8 Strong, durable bonds between restorative materials and tooth substrate are essential, not only from a mechanical standpoint, but also from the biologic and esthetic perspectives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%