2017
DOI: 10.1177/0022034517728714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bonding to CAD-CAM Composites: An Interfacial Fracture Toughness Approach

Abstract: The objective of this study was to evaluate the interfacial fracture toughness (IFT) of composite cement with dispersed filler (DF) versus polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (PICN) computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) composite blocks after 2 different surface pretreatments using the notchless triangular prism (NTP) test. Two DFs (Cerasmart [CRT] and Lava Ultimate [LVA]), 2 PICNs (Enamic [ENA] and experimental PICN [EXP]), and e.max CAD lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (EMX, contro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
44
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study involves the fabrication of identical crowns on identical metal dies, this was to investigate one variance between groups Graph 1: Fracture load of groups with and without aging a conclusion that is supported by the results of the present study even though the differences recorded did not reach statistical significance in all four assessed groups. The larger fracture resistance recorded for e.Max is likely due to the interpenetrating needle-type lithium disilicate that responds better to load than the dispersed spherical charge in RNC or the fused particles of PICN; this result is in agreement with previously published results, 6,18,[26][27][28][29][30] and the literature highlights that lithium disilicate has clearly higher fracture strength than other ceramic groups. 6,18,26,[28][29][30] PICN with fused particles proved having higher strength than RNC with dispersed fillers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This study involves the fabrication of identical crowns on identical metal dies, this was to investigate one variance between groups Graph 1: Fracture load of groups with and without aging a conclusion that is supported by the results of the present study even though the differences recorded did not reach statistical significance in all four assessed groups. The larger fracture resistance recorded for e.Max is likely due to the interpenetrating needle-type lithium disilicate that responds better to load than the dispersed spherical charge in RNC or the fused particles of PICN; this result is in agreement with previously published results, 6,18,[26][27][28][29][30] and the literature highlights that lithium disilicate has clearly higher fracture strength than other ceramic groups. 6,18,26,[28][29][30] PICN with fused particles proved having higher strength than RNC with dispersed fillers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…For Lava Ultimate, the influence of micromechanical interlocking on the performance of the adhesive interface is particularly important since a high degree of conversion of polymers decreases the potential for chemical co-polymerization of any remaining free monomers with the monomers of the adhesive or resin cement. 23 The adhesion of ceramic materials may be enhanced by increasing the surface energy, and it can improve the wettability of the adhesive or resin cement on the material surface. 24 Thus, internal surface etching with hydrofluoric acid was performed according to the etching times recommended by the manufacturers of Vita Mark II, Vita Suprinity and Vita Enamic to create a reactive area that promotes resin infiltration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the surface of the ceramic became rough and micromechanically retentive. 23,27 Vita Suprinity was etched for 20 s, and this surface treatment created a relatively smooth surface with small undercuts, which can be attributed to the specific microstructure with fine, densely packed crystals. 27 Additionally, when the ceramic is etched, hydroxyl groups are exposed, and this group allows a chemical interaction with the silane coupling agent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main difference of the proposed approach with conventional indirect methods is related to the absence of new VDO testing phase and provisional restorations use (One step), definitive indirect restorations being all bonded within two consecutive days, which reduces visit number, chairtime, cost and treatment complexity. The procedure is also characterized by the material approach, with the use of PICN materials (hybrid ceramics), which exhibit several advantages compared to ceramics and other composite materials, such as (1) the ability to be milled to a very low thickness with less edge chipping than ceramics which allowed for a “No prep” approach and a restoration design corresponding to the estimated tissue loss; (2) the ease of in‐mouth adjustments: the management of occlusal relationships required meticulous adjustments and from that point of view, PICNs were shown to be more adapted than ceramics; (3) the biomechanical properties, ceramics being brittle and stiff, while direct light‐cured composites exhibit a reduced strength and a too low elasticity modulus compared to tooth tissues; (4) the high degree of conversion of monomers, which improves chemical stability and reduces free monomer release compared to light‐cured composites; (5) the bonding properties, which were shown to be as good as glass‐ceramics when the material is etched . The use of CAD‐CAM indirect restorations facilitates tooth anatomy and occlusion management with a reduced chairtime compared to direct composites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%