2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bone bonding, displacement, and absorption in cases of double-door laminoplasty with unidirectional porous hydroxyapatite spacers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
13
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In literature, higher-porosity HA spacers have a trend of higher bone bonding: 27.5%-83.9% in spacers with a porosity of 40%, [19][20][21] 8.7%-60.5% with a porosity of 60%, 7,10 and 67.0%-90% with a porosity of 75%. 11,13 In the current study, highporosity (50%) HA spacers showed an accelerated bone bonding compared to low-porosity (35%) HA spacers, which is in agreement with reported evidence. Then, although the bone volume of laminae in contact with the inserted HA spacer showed a trend of time-dependent absorption both in high-porosity (50%) and lowporosity (35%) HA spacers, a relatively reduced severity of bone absorption was found in high-porosity (50%) HA spacers compared to in low-porosity (35%) HA spacers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In literature, higher-porosity HA spacers have a trend of higher bone bonding: 27.5%-83.9% in spacers with a porosity of 40%, [19][20][21] 8.7%-60.5% with a porosity of 60%, 7,10 and 67.0%-90% with a porosity of 75%. 11,13 In the current study, highporosity (50%) HA spacers showed an accelerated bone bonding compared to low-porosity (35%) HA spacers, which is in agreement with reported evidence. Then, although the bone volume of laminae in contact with the inserted HA spacer showed a trend of time-dependent absorption both in high-porosity (50%) and lowporosity (35%) HA spacers, a relatively reduced severity of bone absorption was found in high-porosity (50%) HA spacers compared to in low-porosity (35%) HA spacers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This study's comparison between the two alternating HA spacers in each patient is useful to minimize the association of metabolic disorders, for example, diabetes and osteoporosis, in elderly patients and also the difference among baseline pathologies for cervical myelopathy. In literature, higher‐porosity HA spacers have a trend of higher bone bonding: 27.5%–83.9% in spacers with a porosity of 40%, 8.7%–60.5% with a porosity of 60%, and 67.0%–90% with a porosity of 75% . In the current study, high‐porosity (50%) HA spacers showed an accelerated bone bonding compared to low‐porosity (35%) HA spacers, which is in agreement with reported evidence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations