2020
DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000020442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bone defect reconstruction with autologous bone inactivated with liquid nitrogen after resection of primary limb malignant tumors

Abstract: Surgical treatment of malignant bone tumors comprises tumor resection and reconstruction. The most commonly used reconstruction method is prosthesis replacement, which achieves good early function, but has a high long-term incidence of complications. Another reconstruction option is autologous bone replantation, which has the advantages of anatomical matching and no need for large bone bank support. Few studies have evaluated reconstruction with liquid nitrogen-inactivated autogenous bone. The pres… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach suffers from problems in common with allograft including fracture, nonunion and infection. 53 , 54 Although there is less experience published for Masquelet-induced membrane restoration of intercalary defects for tumours, the method can be successful for defects over 20 cm. 55 That approach simplifies the primary resection with provisional stabilization but mandates a second substantial procedure.…”
Section: Humeral Diaphysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach suffers from problems in common with allograft including fracture, nonunion and infection. 53 , 54 Although there is less experience published for Masquelet-induced membrane restoration of intercalary defects for tumours, the method can be successful for defects over 20 cm. 55 That approach simplifies the primary resection with provisional stabilization but mandates a second substantial procedure.…”
Section: Humeral Diaphysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is necessary to have enough bone stock to support prosthesis when it is indicated. Recently, tumour-bearing frozen autograft has more commonly employed as a bony resource in bone and joint defect reconstructive procedures, especially in resource-constrained environments [1] , [2] , [3] . There were reports favouring the use of liquid nitrogen to extracorporeally treat tumour-bearing bone instead of other methods such as irradiation, pasteurization and autoclaving due to its better osteoinductive ability [4] , [5] and preservation of compression strength of the treated bone [6] .…”
Section: Introduction and Importancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The preservation of native hip joints can lower the risk of muscle damage, surgical disruption, and articular surface degeneration relative to the use of endoprosthetic hip joints, thereby improving the overall function of the lower extremities in treated patients. Alternative approaches to hip-preserving reconstruction (HPR) following MFMT resection include the use of inactivated autologous bone grafts ( 7 ), osteoarticular allografts ( 8 ), combined autografts and allofraft ( 9 , 10 ), and endoprostheses. Inactivated autologous bone grafted has the advantage of anatomical matching, biological reconstruction, relatively low cost, and no need for large bone bank support; however, inactivated bone fracture, infection, non-union, and internal fixation failure are the disadvantages of this technique ( 7 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative approaches to hip-preserving reconstruction (HPR) following MFMT resection include the use of inactivated autologous bone grafts ( 7 ), osteoarticular allografts ( 8 ), combined autografts and allofraft ( 9 , 10 ), and endoprostheses. Inactivated autologous bone grafted has the advantage of anatomical matching, biological reconstruction, relatively low cost, and no need for large bone bank support; however, inactivated bone fracture, infection, non-union, and internal fixation failure are the disadvantages of this technique ( 7 ). Osteoarticular allograft can result in the biological reconstruction of bone defects and preserve host bone stock without donor site morbidity ( 11 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%