Bone dimensional variations at implants placed in fresh extraction sockets: a multilevel multivariate analysis

Tomasi, Cristiano; Sanz, Mariano; Cecchinato, Denis; Pjetursson, Bjarni E.; Ferrús, Jorge; Lang, Niklaus P.; Lindhe, Jan

doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01848.x

Cited by 218 publications

(268 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

223

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…83mm versus 0.6 ± 0.55mm. Similarly, Tomasi et al (2010) observed in a multilevel analysis how every 1mm increase of the implant position towards the buccal aspect resulted in a resorption of the buccal bone wall of 0.22mm. observed on CBCTs after 6 months how the buccal plate was preserved when implants were lingually positioned.…”

Section: Implant Positionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A more palatal placement of the implants in the flapless group could explain the increased lingual height reduction as well as the greater stability of the buccal wall height in this treatment group (Tomasi et al 2010). Blanco et al (2008) compared flap and flapless approach on immediate implants in a beagle dog model and showed that, at three months, the first bone to implant contact was located more apically on those sites were a flap had been raised, but it was not statistically significant.…”

Section: Flap Versus Flapless Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, evidence from animal and human studies have shown that implant installation does not interfere with bone remodeling (Boticelli et al 2004(Boticelli et al , 2006Araujo et al 2005Araujo et al , 2006Sanz et al 2009;Ferrus et al 2010;Tomasi et al 2010;Discepoli et al 2014). …”

Section: Hard and Soft Tissue Changes After Immediate Implant Placementmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Since a marked ridge resorption of the bone walls have been observed after immediate implant placement, Ferrus et al (2010) and Tomasi et al (2010) evaluated several factors that could be related with this phenomenon. They analyzed patient-related factors, cause of tooth extraction, implant location (anterior/posterior), size of the buccal gap and buccal plate thickness.…”

Section: Hard and Soft Tissue Changes After Immediate Implant Placementmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Bone volume changes after immediate implant placement with or without flap elevation

Mazzocco

Jimenez

Barallat

et al. 2016

Clinical Oral Implants Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ADVERTIMENT. La consulta d'aquesta tesi queda condicionada a l'acceptació de les següents condicions d'ús: La difusió d'aquesta tesi per mitjà del servei TDX (www.tesisenxarxa.net) ha estat autoritzada pels titulars dels drets de propietat intel·lectual únicament per a usos privats emmarcats en activitats d'investigació i docència. No s'autoritza la seva reproducció amb finalitats de lucre ni la seva difusió i posada a disposició des d'un lloc aliè al servei TDX. No s'autoritza la presentació del seu contingut en una finestra o marc aliè a TDX (framing). Aquesta reserva de drets afecta tant al resum de presentació de la tesi com als seus continguts. En la utilització o cita de parts de la tesi és obligat indicar el nom de la persona autora.ADVERTENCIA. La consulta de esta tesis queda condicionada a la aceptación de las siguientes condiciones de uso: La difusión de esta tesis por medio del servicio TDR (www.tesisenred.net) ha sido autorizada por los titulares de los derechos de propiedad intelectual únicamente para usos privados enmarcados en actividades de investigación y docencia. No se autoriza su reproducción con finalidades de lucro ni su difusión y puesta a disposición desde un sitio ajeno al servicio TDR. No se autoriza la presentación de su contenido en una ventana o marco ajeno a TDR (framing). Esta reserva de derechos afecta tanto al resumen de presentación de la tesis como a sus contenidos. En la utilización o cita de partes de la tesis es obligado indicar el nombre de la persona autora. WARNING.On having consulted this thesis you're accepting the following use conditions: Spreading this thesis by the TDX (www.tesisenxarxa.net) service has been authorized by the titular of the intellectual property rights only for private uses placed in investigation and teaching activities. Reproduction with lucrative aims is not authorized neither its spreading and availability from a site foreign to the TDX service.Introducing its content in a window or frame foreign to the TDX service is not authorized (framing).

show abstract

Section: Implant Positionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Flap Versus Flapless Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Hard and Soft Tissue Changes After Immediate Implant Placementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Hard and Soft Tissue Changes After Immediate Implant Placementmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Bone volume changes after immediate implant placement with or without flap elevation

Mazzocco

Jimenez

Barallat

et al. 2016

Clinical Oral Implants Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A clinical study conducted by Evans and Chen [23] showed that implants whose shoulders were placed in the vestibular direction or coincided with a line passing through the cervical margin of the adjacent teeth led to a recession of the vestibular tissue three times higher than implants placed in the lingual direction (1.8 vs 0.6 mm) [23,24].…”

Section: Diagnosis and Implant Placementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Factors Influencing Immediate Maxillary Dental Implant Placement and Bone Resorption: A Review of the Literature and an Outlook on the Clinical Possibilities

Bianco¹

2016

Dent. Med. Probl.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The insertion of dental implants immediately after teeth extractions has become a routine clinical procedure in implant dentistry, despite difficulties derived from several factors influencing bone resorption. The aim of this study is to evaluate the survival rate of implant positioned immediately after tooth extraction in the upper maxilla and to analyze the surgical techniques and the parameters to minimize physiological bone resorption. An electronic search in MEDLINE (PubMed) and the Cochrane library was performed to analyze the factors that may influence physiological bone resorption during immediate implant placement: surgical technique, position of the implant and bone grafting. Immediate implant placement is a predictable technique with a high success rate. It does not prevent bone resorption subsequent to tooth extraction, but there are some parameters to take into account to minimize the bone resorption itself. Despite the high survival rate, more long-term studies are necessary to evaluate the success of implants placed immediately into fresh extraction sockets in the upper maxillary. Special attention has to be given to aesthetic outcomes (Dent. Med. Probl. 2016, 53, 3, 408-412).

show abstract

References

2012

Esthetic Soft Tissue Management of Teeth and Implants

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bone dimensional variations at implants placed in fresh extraction sockets: a multilevel multivariate analysis

Abstract: Clinicians must consider the thickness of the buccal bony wall in the extraction site and the vertical as well as the horizontal positioning of the implant in the socket, because these factors will influence hard tissue changes during healing.

Cited by 218 publications

References 20 publications

Bone volume changes after immediate implant placement with or without flap elevation

Bone volume changes after immediate implant placement with or without flap elevation

Factors Influencing Immediate Maxillary Dental Implant Placement and Bone Resorption: A Review of the Literature and an Outlook on the Clinical Possibilities

References

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About