2014
DOI: 10.11607/prd.1895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bone Dimensions in the Posterior Mandible: A Retrospective Radiographic Study Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Part 2— Analysis of Edentulous Sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

22
106
3
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
22
106
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…To avoid this anatomical landmark, an implant could be placed off-axially and would have to be restored with an angled abutment. 1,15 Findings of this study were consistent with those of Braut et al 1 This study comprised all the patients who were selected for implant placement. Analysis of bone dimensions was done keeping in mind immediate implant therapy if needed in future.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To avoid this anatomical landmark, an implant could be placed off-axially and would have to be restored with an angled abutment. 1,15 Findings of this study were consistent with those of Braut et al 1 This study comprised all the patients who were selected for implant placement. Analysis of bone dimensions was done keeping in mind immediate implant therapy if needed in future.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Analysis of the dimensions may be important in formulating appropriate treatment plan. 1 Additionally, placement of immediate implants in fresh extraction sockets could prevent osseous changes that occur postextraction. 2 Clinical observations suggest that buccal bone resorption varies in magnitude among individuals and from site to site.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…18,19 Other studies used the CEJ as a reference point, and measurements were taken at points 1 to 5 mm from the buccal bone crest. 14,20,21 In this study, bone thickness was measured starting at 3 mm from the CEJ because implants have been suggested to be placed apico-coronally, 2 to 3 mm below the adjacent CEJ. 22 The topology (right and left sides) and sex did not influence the overall measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%