2021
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bone fracture as a novel immune‐related adverse event with immune checkpoint inhibitors: Case series and large‐scale pharmacovigilance analysis

Abstract: Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are associated with different immune-related adverse events (irAEs), the potential effect on the skeleton is poorly defined albeit biologically plausible and assessable through pharmacovigilance. We described a case series of patients experiencing skeletal fractures while on ICIs at the National Cancer Institute of Milan. To better characterize the clinical features of skeletal irAEs reported with ICIs, we queried the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, ICIs are correlated with a variety of toxicities as results of an excessively activated immune system and, therefore, considered as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Despite these toxicities may potentially affect all host tissues [5][6][7][8][9], the effect on the skeleton is poorly investigated due to the few and small case series reported in literature [10,11]. These studies described skeletal adverse effects in patients treated with ICIs including serious vertebral fractures that, in some cases, affected multiple sites [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, ICIs are correlated with a variety of toxicities as results of an excessively activated immune system and, therefore, considered as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Despite these toxicities may potentially affect all host tissues [5][6][7][8][9], the effect on the skeleton is poorly investigated due to the few and small case series reported in literature [10,11]. These studies described skeletal adverse effects in patients treated with ICIs including serious vertebral fractures that, in some cases, affected multiple sites [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these toxicities may potentially affect all host tissues [5][6][7][8][9], the effect on the skeleton is poorly investigated due to the few and small case series reported in literature [10,11]. These studies described skeletal adverse effects in patients treated with ICIs including serious vertebral fractures that, in some cases, affected multiple sites [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conclusion, these results allow for a better understanding of potential bone-related side effects in patients that receive immune checkpoint inhibition as therapy for malignant disease. It seems plausible that adverse events such as bone fractures represent highly efficient or rather ‘too effective’ therapeutic approaches, considering that some patients who showed a complete clinical response to their cancer therapy after treatment with ICIs suffered bone fractures ( 3 ). Hence, the main challenge in cancer therapy is to balance successful anti-malignant therapy while preventing serious, often bone-related, adverse effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current diagnostic and therapeutical management for diseases such as osteoporosis, aseptic loosening of endoprostheses, and certain cancers is insufficient. However, there is evidence about underlying osteoimmunological mechanisms that are immensely relevant in development of osteoporotic conditions and skeletal fractures (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…51,52 Some hope is placed on newer, more targeted therapy, but the development of such novel therapies will also introduce a new spectrum of toxicities and we have sparse knowledge at this point how these will affect the future health of childhood cancer survivors. 53…”
Section: Study Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%