2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2005.05.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bone geometry in response to long-term tennis playing and its relationship with muscle volume: A quantitative magnetic resonance imaging study in tennis players

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
68
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
6
68
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These results agree with studies of racquet sport athletes that controlled for genetic, hormonal, and nutritional variability while assessing the unilateral effects of physical activity. 43,44 Larger muscle and bone size were observed at both forearm 45 and humerus 43 in these athletes. However, the difference in variance between forearm and upper-arm bones was not explicitly explained by a difference in forearm 45 and upper-arm muscle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results agree with studies of racquet sport athletes that controlled for genetic, hormonal, and nutritional variability while assessing the unilateral effects of physical activity. 43,44 Larger muscle and bone size were observed at both forearm 45 and humerus 43 in these athletes. However, the difference in variance between forearm and upper-arm bones was not explicitly explained by a difference in forearm 45 and upper-arm muscle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…43,44 Larger muscle and bone size were observed at both forearm 45 and humerus 43 in these athletes. However, the difference in variance between forearm and upper-arm bones was not explicitly explained by a difference in forearm 45 and upper-arm muscle. 43 Comparisons of forearm bone and muscle differences between gymnasts and their matched non-gymnast controls provided similar evidence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Participation in asymmetric sport disciplines is connected with asymmetric changes in soft tissues (Ducher et al, 2005;Haapasalo et al, 1998). As was noticed, soft tissues indicate greater lateral differences than skeletal measurements (Van Dusen, 1939;Chhibber & Singh, 1970;Kimura & Asaeda, 1974;).…”
Section: Morphological Asymmetry In Sportmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Some authors (Maughan et al, 1986) observed greater proportion of muscle and smaller proportion of fat in dominant arm than the opposite limb in tennis players. Numerous studies indicated increased bone density in the dominant limb among tennis players (Ruff et al, 1994;Ducher et al, 2005;Lucki & Nicolay, 2007). Analysis of the bilateral asymmetry among collegiate (19-24 years old) tennis players showed that forearm circumferences of the dominant limb was greater than in the opposite limb (3-10% in female and 2-13% in male tennis players) (Lucki & Nikolay, 2007).…”
Section: Morphological Asymmetry Of Athletes -Research Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Several sports cause high training load during practice and thus act positively on bone accrual during growth, such as soccer, tennis and rugby. [8][9][10][11] However, the effects on bone mineral variables caused by sports participation performed in hypogravity during adolescence still remain unclear, 10,12 mainly because previous studies failed to control for the burden of important potential confounders in early life, such as training load and biological maturation. 12 In terms of bone mass gain, the pubertal period is responsible for significant accrual of bone mass in both boys and girls.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%