Summary The purpose of the study was to ascertain whether the prognostic significance of staging in multiple myeloma (MM) is influenced by the aggressiveness of effective induction treatment and/or by continuing or discontinuing maintenance chemotherapy. Patients patients, still independent of both induction and post-induction policies. In MM, the significance of staging for survival is independent of both the aggressiveness of induction policy and of continuing or discontinuing maintenance chemotherapy after the maximal tumour reduction has been achieved. Both MPH-P and the association of PTC, VCR and P are effective in inducing first response and also second response in patients failing on the alternative regimen, but PTC-VCR-P causes more side-effects. Thus, the overwhelming majority of patients with MM can safely be given MPH-P as first therapy, and this treatment may be delayed in early disease.Attempts to improve survival of the general population of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) have been focused mainly on chemotherapies more aggressive than the standard melphalan-prednisone (MPH-P) regimen, irrespective of the extent of the disease. Little has been done to evaluate, in prospective studies, the survival value of tailoring therapy according to the stage of the disease, as is done with several other tumours in spite of there being no doubt that early Correspondence: A. Riccardi,