“…Total osteocalcin levels . Total osteocalcin levels were reported in 29 studies [ 21 , 53 , 60 , 62 – 65 , 68 , 74 , 76 , 77 , 80 , 81 , 84 , 92 , 97 , 105 , 107 , 119 , 126 , 129 , 135 , 144 , 146 , 147 , 151 , 153 , 166 , 175 ], including 6,332 participants. Obesity was not associated with any difference in osteocalcin levels between individuals with and without obesity ( S7 Fig ), except in studies combining men and women (n = 9: MD = -3.86 ng/ml, 95% CI: -6.78, -0.95, P = 0.009, I 2 = 97%).…”