Bone mineral density, hand grip strength, smoking status and physical activity in Polish young men

Kopiczko, Anna; Gryko, Karol; Łopuszańska-Dawid, Monika

doi:10.1016/j.jchb.2018.08.003

Cited by 12 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Osteoporosis has been diagnosed mostly in postmenopausal women, but the onset of the disease occurs at a much earlier age. Low peak bone mass and low bone mineral density in relation to age and gender are increasingly common in the population of young women and men [1,2].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Determinants of bone health in adults Polish women: The influence of physical activity, nutrition, sun exposure and biological factors

Kopiczko

2020

PLoS ONE

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to assess the determinants of bone health in the group of women over 40 years old. Lifestyle factors such as past and present physical activity, past and present sun exposure, current dietary intake of calcium and vitamin D, nutritional status as measured by BMI, family history of osteoporosis and current hormonal status were analysed. Methods The study involved 500 women over 40 years old. All examined women was the same ethnicity-European origin. Methods used: densitometry method (DXA), bioelectrical impedance analysis, International Physical Activity Questionnaire, nutrition questionnaire, past and present sun exposure questionnaire. Past and present physical activity, past and present sun exposure and sufficient level of calcium in the diet proved to be the most important factors determining mineralization of bone tissue of women. In order to indicate an independent association of the correct bone tissue mineralization with individual factors, multivariate analysis was used-logistic regression. Results The norm BMD in the distal part of the forearm was strongly influenced: recommended dietary calcium intake (OR = 5.95; p = 0.003), moderately (OR = 1.88; p = 0.053) and high (OR = 14.0; p<0.001) past physical activity, sufficient (OR = 4.97; p<0.001) and high (OR = 18.9; p = 0.004) level of present physical activity, sufficient past (OR = 5.15; p<0.001) and sufficient present sun exposure (OR = 10.0; p<0.001). The chance for the BMD prox norm was also increased several times: high past physical activity (OR = 68.4; p<0.0001) and sufficient past sun exposure (OR = 10.6; p<0.001), moderate past activity (OR = 4.20; p<0.001), sufficient (OR = 6.13; p<0.001) and high (OR = 10.0; p<0.001) present physical activity, sufficient present sun exposure (OR = 9.09; p<0.0001), recommended intake of calcium (OR = 9.57; p<0.001) and vitamin D (OR = 2.68; p = 0.052). Whereas e significantly lower likelihood for the BMD prox norm was found

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Determinants of bone health in adults Polish women: The influence of physical activity, nutrition, sun exposure and biological factors

Kopiczko

2020

PLoS ONE

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In the proximal segment, a high percentage of low BMD is particularly worrying also in the same groups of boys (in 70.6% of non-athletes and 83.3% of swimmers). Among children [ 47 ], young adults [ 14 , 17 , 48 ], and physically inactive adults and older adults [ 6 , 10 ], the frequency of low BMD is higher than in peers undertaking regular PA. On the other hand, not all types of physical exercise and forms of movement have shown positive effects on BMD and BMC. Swimming training improves mental health parameters, cognitive abilities and motor coordination of children and adolescents [ 49 ], but at the same time does not produce osteogenic benefits [ 34 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Then, it is gradually transformed into the bone through a process called bone mineral density (BMD) [ 2 ]. This process is determined by both non-modifiable genetic factors [ 3 , 4 ] and a number of modifiable, demographic, socio-economic, hormonal, and especially lifestyle-related factors [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ]. Although genetics plays an important role in determining PBM, environmental factors such as diets [ 9 ] and level of physical activity (PA) [ 10 ], especially in late childhood and early adolescence, are considered important modulators of individual genetic potential.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bone Mineral Density in Adolescent Boys: Cross-Sectional Observational Study

Kopiczko

Adamczyk

Łopuszańska-Dawid

2020

IJERPH

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Physical inactivity of children can be a precursor of reduced bone mineral density, considered to be a typical problem only in old age. The aim of this study was to evaluate bone mineral density in 96 Polish boys aged 14–17 years with varied physical activity (swimmers, track and field athletes, non-athletes) and the effect of bone composition, birth weight and breastfeeding during infancy on bone parameters. Anthropometric and body composition measurements were performed according to the kinanthropometric standards. Bone parameters of the forearm were measured by means of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Data on the infant’s birth weight and the length of breastfeeding were collected during direct interviews with mothers. The strongest links with bone parameters were found for the type of physical activity and birth weight. Regardless of birth weight, track and field athletes had the most advantageous bone parameters (mainly sT-score prox values). Swimmers with normal or low birth weight had less favourable sT-score prox values than non-athletes. The type of physical activity proved to be an important determinant of bone parameters. Childhood and adolescence are important periods of bone development and increasing the content of bone mineral components, and the bone status in later years of life depends to a large extent on this period. The perinatal period, especially the correct birth weight of the child, not only has a significant effect on general health, but also on bone status.

show abstract

“…In B-type CO 3 2− (i.e. substituting for PO 4 3− ) apatites, the ν 3 PO 4 3− band is most obvious up to ~ 3 wt% CO 3 2− , but is almost completely enveloped by the ν 1 CO 3 2− peak in bone [43], where the CO 3 2− content is much higher, and typically around 7-9 wt% [44].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In 2012 alone, the global cost of smoking-attributable diseases (excluding second-hand smoking) was equivalent to 5.7% of the global health expenditure [3]. In addition to being a risk factor for poor bone mineral density [4] and increased cortical porosity [5], the effects of smoking on periodontal health are well-documented [6,7]. Although dental rehabilitation using osseointegrated implants is a reliable treatment modality with high survival rates [8,9], smoking can modulate the expression of osteogenic and inflammatory factors in alveolar bone [10], implant-adherent cells [11], and in the peri-implant crevicular fluid [12,13].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Does Smoking Impair Bone Regeneration in the Dental Alveolar Socket?

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Smoking is a major risk factor for dental implant failure. In addition to higher marginal bone loss around implants, the cellular and molecular responses to injury and implant physicochemical properties are also differentially affected in smokers. The purpose of this work is to determine if smoking impairs bone microstructure and extracellular matrix composition within the dental alveolar socket after tooth extraction. Alveolar bone biopsies obtained from Smokers (> 10 cigarettes per day for at least 10 years) and Ctrl (never-smokers), 7-146 months after tooth extraction, were investigated using X-ray micro-computed tomography, backscattered electron scanning electron microscopy, and Raman spectroscopy. Both Smokers and Ctrl exhibited high inter-and intra-individual heterogeneity in bone microstructure, which varied between dense cortical and porous trabecular architecture. Regions of disorganised/woven bone were more prevalent during early healing. Remodelled lamellar bone was predominant at longer healing periods. Bone mineral density, bone surface-to-volume ratio, mineral crystallinity, the carbonate-to-phosphate ratio, the mineral-to-matrix ratio, the collagen crosslink ratio, and the amounts of amino acids phenylalanine and proline/hydroxyproline were also comparable between Smokers and Ctrl. Bone microstructure and composition within the healing dental alveolar socket are not significantly affected by moderate-to-heavy smoking.

show abstract

Bone mineral density, hand grip strength, smoking status and physical activity in Polish young men

Cited by 12 publications

References 36 publications

Determinants of bone health in adults Polish women: The influence of physical activity, nutrition, sun exposure and biological factors

Determinants of bone health in adults Polish women: The influence of physical activity, nutrition, sun exposure and biological factors

Bone Mineral Density in Adolescent Boys: Cross-Sectional Observational Study

Does Smoking Impair Bone Regeneration in the Dental Alveolar Socket?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About