Aim: Peripheral methods are increasingly used to assess bone health, despite little evidence on their predictive ability. We aimed to evaluate the usefulness of forearm dualenergy X-ray absorptiometry in prepubertal children, by estimating the agreement between peripheral and central measures and the ability to predict fracture history.
Methods:In 2012/2014, we assessed 1177 seven-year-old children from the Generation XXI cohort who were recruited at birth in all five public hospitals with maternity wards in Porto, Portugal. Subtotal and lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) and content, leftarm BMD and peripheral forearm BMD were measured. Parents reported the child's lifetime fracture history. We estimated agreement using Bland-Altman's method and Cohen's kappa. Fracture prediction ability was calculated using area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC-AUC).Results: The limits of agreement were very wide, ranging from À2.20/2.20 to À1.87/
Conclusion:This study suggests that forearm BMD has limited use for bone health research or as a basis for clinical decisions in prepubertal children.
INTRODUCTIONIn both clinical and research settings, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) remains the gold standard method for assessing bone physical properties -bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content (BMC) -in adults and children (1). In clinical settings, paediatric DXA has mostly been used to assist in the diagnosis and monitoring of primary and secondary osteoporosis. In research, paediatric DXA scans have been increasingly used due to their tempting availability, safety, ease of use and ability to estimate body composition. Conceptually, investigating bone quality in generally healthy children follows the life course premise that childhood and adolescence are sensitive periods for bone mass acquisition and consequent bone health in adulthood (2).