Multiple pharmacological agents are now available for individuals with high fracture risk (osteoporosis), raising the issue of which drug/s should be prescribed, and when. The recent review by Martin and Seeman 1 provides a cell biology basis for understanding sequential therapies in long term bone health.Antiresorptive agents began with bisphosphonates (alendronate, risedronate, and the nitrogen-containing zoledronate), and now include the anti-RANKL therapy denosumab. As well as suppressing bone resorption, Martin and Seeman make the point that, since osteoclasts initiate bone remodelling, antiresorptives suppress this renewal process. This means they reduce both bone resorption and formation, due to the coupling signals by which osteoclasts recruit osteoblast precursors to the bone remodelling unit, 2 and therefore only slow bone loss. They point out that for this reason, a common approach to osteoporosis therapy is to start by building bone with an anabolic agent, such as teriparatide, abaloparatide, or romosozumab.Teriparatide and abaloparatide are similar because they are based on the highly-similar N-terminal regions of parathyroid hormone (PTH) and PTH-related protein. 3 They both build bone by stimulating bone remodelling activity, and by overfilling the resorbed space, equivalent to increasing modeling at a microscopic level. 4 Although they stimulate remodelling and must therefore stimulate osteoclasts, Martin and Seeman suggest the anabolic effect results mainly from direct actions on the osteoblast lineage. This includes their action to inhibit sclerostin, a Wnt pathway inhibitor which acts as a brake on bone formation. The third anabolic agent available, romosozumab, is an antibody to sclerostin so also releases Neurospine