1980
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-0503(80)80068-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bone resection, extra-corporal cryotherapy and immediate re-implantation in the treatment of mandibular tumours

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Frozen bone experimentation was conducted in the 1970s, but the technique was abandoned because of the high failure rate. [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] The most frequent cause of failure was rejection as a result of exposure to saliva, infection, or inadequate vascularization. The risk of failure was greater when soft tissues had been extensively removed to achieve oncological radicality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Frozen bone experimentation was conducted in the 1970s, but the technique was abandoned because of the high failure rate. [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] The most frequent cause of failure was rejection as a result of exposure to saliva, infection, or inadequate vascularization. The risk of failure was greater when soft tissues had been extensively removed to achieve oncological radicality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This alternative utilizes the experience accumulated using free soft-tissue flaps in conjunction with plates. 21,22 Animal studies, [23][24][25][26][27] subsequently confirmed in humans, [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] have shown that removed segments of mandible can be devitalized by freezing and revitalized after reimplantation. That freezing in liquid nitrogen cleanses the tissue of cancer cells has been demonstrated in vitro, in animals, and in clinical studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their results showed a fair success rate of approximately 35% in some nonirradiated beds, but only 15% of the grafts were successful when utilized pri¬ marily in irradiated wounds. Recent reports by Panje and Cutting11 and Cuono and Ariyan14 reveal success rates varying from 50% to 80% in nonirradiated beds.The unreliability of this technique and the many unacceptable donor site defects have made this method unattractive.Accepted for publication April10, 1986. From the Departments of Otolaryngology (Dr Gullane) and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Dr Holmes), University of Toronto.Read in part at the fall meeting of the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Atlanta,Oct 18-19, 1985.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A taxa média de infecção foi de 15%, semelhante à taxa de 16% de Dong et al, em 1996. Popescu e;Spirescu, 1980, relata 75 % a taxa de infecção, em consenso, Emmings et al, 1971, Marciani et al, 1977, e, Curi et al, 1997 relatam uma taxa de 5,5%.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified