2022
DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ac37ab
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bone segmentation in contrast enhanced whole-body computed tomography

Abstract: Segmentation of bone regions allows for enhanced diagnostics, disease characterisation and treatment monitoring in CT imaging. In contrast enhanced whole-body scans accurate automatic segmentation is particularly difficult as low dose whole body protocols reduce image quality and make contrast enhanced regions more difficult to separate when relying on differences in pixel intensities. This paper outlines a U-net architecture with novel preprocessing techniques, based on the windowing of training data and the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values of Dice coefficient obtained for each type of bone were: 86%(Th 7), 85% (L3), 88% (sacrum), 84% (7th rib) and 83%(sternium). The Dice coefficient value between golden standard and segmentation performed by neural networks in discussed works varies from 83% to 97.9%, where only predictions obtained in [33] resulted in higher value of mDice coefficient then described U-net-Resnet model. The obtained results cannot be directly compared because they apply to different range of bone structures of various anatomical characteristics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The values of Dice coefficient obtained for each type of bone were: 86%(Th 7), 85% (L3), 88% (sacrum), 84% (7th rib) and 83%(sternium). The Dice coefficient value between golden standard and segmentation performed by neural networks in discussed works varies from 83% to 97.9%, where only predictions obtained in [33] resulted in higher value of mDice coefficient then described U-net-Resnet model. The obtained results cannot be directly compared because they apply to different range of bone structures of various anatomical characteristics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In [33] the U-net network prediction combined with preprocessing techniques resulted in segmentation of bone structures in whole body CT scans with the value of mDice coefficient equal to 97.9% and 96.5% for two in-house data-sets and 93.4% for external dataset.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bone tissue segmentation from CT has been shown to work well using slicewise 2D CNN-based segmentation algorithms [4][5][6]. The tasks and solutions become more varied when moving from bone-tissue segmentation to distinct bone segmentation (our task) where we distinguish individual bones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%