2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2008.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bone steady-state is established at reduced bone strength after spinal cord injury: A longitudinal study using peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
68
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
68
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The variability is clearly not completely explained by gender or lesion category. Through a longitudinal pQCT study following 39 SCI patients for 30 months, Frotzler et al [20] have recently shown that key bone parameters do not change significantly in individual patients after 3 years postinjury.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variability is clearly not completely explained by gender or lesion category. Through a longitudinal pQCT study following 39 SCI patients for 30 months, Frotzler et al [20] have recently shown that key bone parameters do not change significantly in individual patients after 3 years postinjury.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent publication found different DOP until steady state for different parameter and scan sites [24]. Based on previously published cross-sectional data from a large number of subjects with paraplegia and tetraplegia [7], Frotzler et al performed all statistical analyses of tibial and femoral bone data, including only subjects with a lesion duration of at least the time to reach bone steady state (t) for each particular bone parameter calculated from bone measurements at t0 [24]. They chose the cutoff point of 8 years because this was the maximum time required for the femur and tibia to reach the new steady state [7].…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 97%
“…SSI is an important validated biomechanical strength bone parameter because it is related to bone breaking force, an explanation of why people with chronic SCI are prone to bone fractures [23]. A recent publication found different DOP until steady state for different parameter and scan sites [24]. Based on previously published cross-sectional data from a large number of subjects with paraplegia and tetraplegia [7], Frotzler et al performed all statistical analyses of tibial and femoral bone data, including only subjects with a lesion duration of at least the time to reach bone steady state (t) for each particular bone parameter calculated from bone measurements at t0 [24].…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 Both dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and peripheral quantitative computerised tomography (pQCT) have been used to investigate bone changes after SCI. [5][6][7] Although there are large databases of DXA values in the lumbar spine, proximal femur and distal radius, most fractures in SCI patients occur in the distal femur or proximal tibia; these are not sites normally scanned by DXA and therefore there is no large database of controls. pQCT data has been reported for the distal tibia, 6,8 but not together with data on proximal tibia, which is a more common site for fractures in SCI patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%