2010
DOI: 10.1097/brs.0b013e3181de4f2e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bone Union Rate With Autologous Iliac Bone Versus Local Bone Graft in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Abstract: Fusion results from the local bone group and the autologous iliac bone group were nearly identical. Furthermore, fusion progression was nearly identical. Complications at donor sites were seen in 17% of the cases. From the aforementioned results, it was concluded that local bone graft is as beneficial as autologous iliac bone graft for PLIF at a single level.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
62
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
62
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ito compared the bone union rate in 101 patients who received either an autologous iliac crest bone graft or a local bone graft with PLIF using carbon cages at 2 years follow-up. He found a fusion rate of 94.5 versus 95.8 % observed by plane radiography [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Ito compared the bone union rate in 101 patients who received either an autologous iliac crest bone graft or a local bone graft with PLIF using carbon cages at 2 years follow-up. He found a fusion rate of 94.5 versus 95.8 % observed by plane radiography [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We reported about a retrospective study conducted at a single facility previously [13], whereas the present study is a retrospective study conducted at multiple facilities. As at the single facility, the result indicates no difference between iliac bone and local bone grafts at the multiple facilities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…without any other supplement was not inferior in fusion rate to autologous iliac crest bone graft when used for short level interbody or posterolateral fusion [11,12]. These results imply that local bone obtained as a by-product of decompression can be enough in quantity and quality to achieve fusion for single or double level lumbar fusion in many cases and pose a question on the usage of costeffectiveness of additional graft extenders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Though autologous iliac crest graft became a gold-standard material for spinal fusion with fusion rate up to 98.9% [6], the morbidities from the donor site including pain, hematoma, infection, fracture and neurovascular injury resulting from the procedure of harvest let patients and surgeons hesitate to accept it as a primary choice for graft material [7][8][9][10]. Recently, for short level fusion of lumbar spine, local decompressed bone without supplementary graft material was reported to be enough to get satisfactory result [11,12]. However, while with insufficient local decompressed bone in quantity and quality, alternative fusion materials are necessary to avoid disadvantages of autologous iliac bone graft.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%