Book review: Mosby's orthodontic review

Ali, Hashim

doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.494

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The relationship between the adjacent teeth of the same arch, their relationship with the teeth of the opposing arch, and the relationship of the teeth with the periodontium (supporting alveolar bone) when the mandible is at rest constitute the static component of occlusion. 20 The term "dynamic" refers to a persistent change in the position of an object, and "dynamic occlusion" refers to the interarch and intra-arch relationships between the teeth and the relationship of the teeth with the supporting bone when the mandible is functioning. In contrast to the current study, Sathyanarayana et al 14 found that the sagittal morphology does not significantly affect the MVMBF value; consistent with the current study, however, they found a significant correlation with the vertical morphology.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Maximum voluntary molar bite force in subjects with malocclusion: multifactor analysis

Alam

Alfawzan

2020

J Int Med Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective This study was performed to determine the maximum voluntary molar bite force (MVMBF) in relation to age, sex, lip competency, midline shifting, dental and skeletal malocclusion, overjet, overbite, and crowding. Methods One hundred Saudi patients with orthodontic malocclusion aged 14 to 25 years (51 male and 49 female patients) were investigated in this cross-sectional study. The baseline MVMBF on the right and left side was evaluated in all patients before commencing any orthodontic treatment. The MVMBF was registered with a portable occlusal force gauge in the first molar region during maximal clenching. Results The MVMBF significantly varied with respect to all nine confounding variables. The MVMBF significantly increased with an age of >18 years, male sex, right-side lip competency, no midline shift, dental and skeletal Class I malocclusion, normal overjet, normal overbite, and mild crowding. Conclusion All nine variables examined in the present study significantly influenced the MVMBF.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%