2012
DOI: 10.1177/1350506811434250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Book review: Why Stories Matter: The Political Grammar of Western Feminist Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pullen (2018) confronts this conundrum in her "Writing as Labiaplasty" text, where her explicit engagement with the female body allows her to forge an empowered intersubjectivist mode of writing, and in the process, reveal the political underpinnings linked to acts of representation. Donna Haraway, cited in Withers (2012), refers to the contrasting approaches to knowledge production as "optic-haptic" perceptions. Optic relates to the knowing-things-from-a-distance tyranny, whereas haptic, in contrast, reflects a "culture of touch" bodily engagement where there is a connection with matters that deeply matter: Haptic engagement conveys an encouragement for knowledge and action to be crafted in touch with everyday practices… [allowing for a] deepened attention to materiality and embodiment [creating] an invitation to re-think relationality and its corporeal character, as well as a desire for concrete, tangible, engagement with worldly transformations (Withers, 2012, p. 244…”
Section: Haptic Bodily Modes Of Signification: Addressing Ambiguitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Pullen (2018) confronts this conundrum in her "Writing as Labiaplasty" text, where her explicit engagement with the female body allows her to forge an empowered intersubjectivist mode of writing, and in the process, reveal the political underpinnings linked to acts of representation. Donna Haraway, cited in Withers (2012), refers to the contrasting approaches to knowledge production as "optic-haptic" perceptions. Optic relates to the knowing-things-from-a-distance tyranny, whereas haptic, in contrast, reflects a "culture of touch" bodily engagement where there is a connection with matters that deeply matter: Haptic engagement conveys an encouragement for knowledge and action to be crafted in touch with everyday practices… [allowing for a] deepened attention to materiality and embodiment [creating] an invitation to re-think relationality and its corporeal character, as well as a desire for concrete, tangible, engagement with worldly transformations (Withers, 2012, p. 244…”
Section: Haptic Bodily Modes Of Signification: Addressing Ambiguitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Haptic engagement conveys an encouragement for knowledge and action to be crafted in touch with everyday practices… [allowing for a] deepened attention to materiality and embodiment [creating] an invitation to re‐think relationality and its corporeal character, as well as a desire for concrete, tangible, engagement with worldly transformations (Withers, 2012, p. 244 emphasis added) 1…”
Section: Haptic Bodily Modes Of Signification: Addressing Ambiguitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation